Experimental evaluation of depth controllers for a small-size AUV

This paper presents the experimental evaluation of different depth control strategies for a small sized low-cost autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV). A cascaded adaptive dynamic model (AdaptDM) control law is introduced to compensate for environmental disturbances. The controller is based on a cascaded structure and the gains of the architecture are estimated based on the interactions between the controller components. This control architecture is compared with the classical decoupled Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller when the vehicle performs tasks in unstructured environments. For controlled environments we evaluated the behaviour of the AdaptDM controller with Proportional Integral Limited (PILIM) structure and a nonlinear sliding mode (SM) controller. The experimental results show low steady-state error when AdaptDM is used, leading to smooth behaviours of small size AUVs performing environmental monitoring.

[1]  Ji-Hong Li,et al.  Design of an adaptive nonlinear controller for depth control of an autonomous underwater vehicle , 2005 .

[2]  Matthew W. Dunnigan,et al.  Dynamic coupling and control issues for a lightweight underwater vehicle manipulator system , 2014, 2014 Oceans - St. John's.

[3]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  AUVs as research vessels: the pros and cons. , 2002 .

[4]  Bo He,et al.  Controller design of an autonomous underwater vehicle using ELM-based sliding mode control , 2017, OCEANS 2017 – Anchorage.

[5]  Feng Lin,et al.  Adaptive Interaction and Its Application to Neural Networks , 1999, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Junku Yuh,et al.  Experimental study on advanced underwater robot control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[7]  Servaas. Holtzhausen Design of an autonomous underwater vehicle : vehicle tracking and position control. , 2010 .

[8]  Pere Ridao,et al.  Toward Autonomous Exploration in Confined Underwater Environments , 2016, J. Field Robotics.

[9]  Hanumant Singh,et al.  Surveying a Subsea Lava Flow Using the Autonomous Benthic Explorer (abe) , 1998, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[10]  Christopher Edwards,et al.  Introduction: Intuitive Theory of Sliding Mode Control , 2014 .

[11]  R. D. Brandt,et al.  Self-tuning of PID controllers by adaptive interaction , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).

[12]  Peter N. Green,et al.  Depth Control for Micro-Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (μAUVs): Simulation and Experimentation , 2014 .

[13]  Cheng Wu,et al.  Depth Control of Model-Free AUVs via Reinforcement Learning , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[14]  Matthew Johnson-Roberson,et al.  Towards low cost, deep water AUV optical mapping , 2018, OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston.

[15]  Stefan B. Williams,et al.  A decoupled , distributed AUV control architecture , 2000 .

[16]  A. J. Healey,et al.  Adaptive sliding mode control of autonomous underwater vehicles in the dive plane , 1990 .

[17]  Matthew W. Dunnigan,et al.  An adaptive controller for autonomous underwater vehicles , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[18]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Marine Control Systems Guidance, Navigation, and Control of Ships, Rigs and Underwater Vehicles , 2002 .