Steady‐State Evoked Potential and Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Group of Children with Absent Click‐Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Response

Objective: 1) To examine the distribution of behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children who had shown no click‐evoked auditory brain stem response (ABR) at maximum presentation levels. 2) To describe the relationship between the 90 Hz steady‐state evoked potential (SSEP) and behavioral thresholds in these subjects. Design: A retrospective study based on clinical findings obtained from 108 infants and young children. Each of these children had shown no recordable ABR to clicks presented at maximum levels (100 dB nHL). SSEP audiograms were obtained using AM/FM tones at the octave frequencies 250 to 4000 Hz. The results of these evoked potential assessments were compared with hearing thresholds established behaviorally. Results: Click‐ABR assessment could not differentiate between the subjects in our sample with total hearing losses and those with useful residual hearing. Although some of the ears were anacusic, more than a quarter showed residual hearing at each of the audiometric frequencies. Furthermore, at least 10% of the behavioral thresholds at each frequency fell within the moderate/severe hearing loss range. A far closer relationship was observed between SSEP and hearing thresholds. On occasions where the SSEP was absent at maximum levels, 99.5% of the ears showed either a total loss or a behavioral threshold within 10 dB of that level. When an SSEP was obtained, the hearing threshold was typically within 5 dB of the SSEP threshold. Conclusion: The results suggested that in our group of selected subjects, the SSEP technique was able to assess ears with only minimal amounts of residual hearing. Where the brevity of the acoustic click limits both its frequency specificity and its presentation level, the modulated tones used for SSEP testing allow accurate, frequency‐specific assessment at high presentation levels.

[1]  A. Markides Age at fitting of hearing aids and speech intelligibility. , 1986, British journal of audiology.

[2]  J. Eggermont THE INADEQUACY OF CLICK‐EVOKED AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSES IN AUDIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS , 1980, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Shigeyuki Kuwada,et al.  Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones , 1986, Hearing Research.

[4]  T W Picton,et al.  Recording auditory brainstem responses from infants. , 1994, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[5]  M P Gorga,et al.  Auditory brainstem response results as predictors of behavioral auditory thresholds in severe and profound hearing impairment , 1990, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  J D Frost,et al.  Effect of sleep on the auditory steady state evoked potential. , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[7]  G. Clark,et al.  Potential and limitations of cochlear implants in children. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[8]  D. Regan Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  A Z Snyder,et al.  Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses relationship to behavioural thresholds in cochlear-impaired adults. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[11]  T. Picton,et al.  The Crib‐O‐Gram in the NICU: An Evaluation Based on Brain Stem Electric Response Audiometry , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[12]  P. Newall,et al.  Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[13]  T W Picton,et al.  Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[14]  R. Dobie,et al.  Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state , 1993, Hearing Research.

[15]  G M Clark,et al.  A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  M. Hyde,et al.  Audiometric accuracy of the click ABR in infants at risk for hearing loss. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D. Stapells,et al.  Thresholds for Auditory Brain Stem Responses to Tones in Notched Noise from Infants and Young Children with Normal Hearing or Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[19]  G M Clark,et al.  Steady-state evoked potentials to amplitude modulated tones in the monkey. , 1992, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[20]  T. Picton,et al.  Prognostic validity of brainstem electric response audiometry in infants of a neonatal intensive care unit. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[21]  Masaru Aoyagi,et al.  Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep , 1993, Hearing Research.

[22]  C. Marchant,et al.  Objective diagnosis of otitis media in early infancy by tympanometry and ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds. , 1986, The Journal of pediatrics.

[23]  S J Norton,et al.  Application of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions to Pediatric Populations , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[24]  G M Clark,et al.  The Automated Prediction of Hearing Thresholds in Sleeping Subjects Using Auditory Steady‐State Evoked Potentials , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[25]  F. Harris Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans with high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Absent auditory brain stem response: Peripheral hearing loss or brain stem dysfunction? , 1984, The Laryngoscope.

[27]  D W Worthington,et al.  Some Comparisons between Auditory Brain Stem Response Thresholds, Latencies, and the Pure‐Tone Audiogram , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[28]  T. Ramkalawan,et al.  The effects of hearing loss and age of intervention on some language metrics in young hearing-impaired children. , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[29]  J. P. Moncur Judge reliability in infant testing. , 1968, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  M. Brocaar,et al.  The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[31]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Frequency‐Specific Audiometry Using Steady‐State Responses , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[32]  D. H. Marshall,et al.  Early detection of hearing impairment: what role is there for behavioural methods in the neonatal period? , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[33]  T W Picton,et al.  Normal hearing thresholds for clicks. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  A. J. Klein,et al.  Acoustically dependent latency shifts of BSER (wave V) in man. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  G M Clark,et al.  Auditory steady-state evoked potential in newborns. , 1994, British journal of audiology.

[36]  T W Picton,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  S Makeig,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses: threshold prediction using phase coherence. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  D A Nelson,et al.  Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[39]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[40]  T W Picton,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  R. Burkard Sound pressure level measurement and spectral analysis of brief acoustic transients. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[42]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Vibrotactile thresholds in pure tone audiometry. , 1970, Acta oto-laryngologica.