Phenology of a northern hardwood forest canopy

While commonplace in other parts of the world, long-term and ongoing observations of the phenology of native tree species are rare in North America. We use 14 years of field survey data from the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest to fit simple models of canopy phenology for three northern hardwood species, sugar maple (Acer saccharum), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), and yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis). These models are then run with historical meteorological data to investigate potential climate change effects on phenology. Development and senescence are quantified using an index that ranges from 0 (dormant, no leaves) to 4 (full, green canopy). Sugar maple is the first species to leaf out in the spring, whereas American beech is the last species to drop its leaves in the fall. Across an elevational range from 250 to 825 m ASL, the onset of spring is delayed by 2.7±0.4 days for every 100 m increase in elevation, which is in reasonable agreement with Hopkin's law. More than 90% of the variation in spring canopy development, and just slightly less than 90% of the variation in autumn canopy senescence, is accounted for by a logistic model based on accumulated degree-days. However, degree-day based models fit to Hubbard Brook data appear to overestimate the rate at which spring development occurs at the more southerly Harvard Forest. Autumn senescence at the Harvard Forest can be predicted with reasonable accuracy in sugar maple but not American beech. Retrospective modeling using five decades (1957–2004) of Hubbard Brook daily mean temperature data suggests significant trends (P≤0.05) towards an earlier spring (e.g. sugar maple, rate of change=0.18 days earlier/yr), consistent with other studies documenting measurable climate change effects on the onset of spring in both North America and Europe. Our results also suggest that green canopy duration has increased by about 10 days (e.g. sugar maple, rate of change=0.21 days longer/yr) over the period of study.

[1]  Denis-Didier Rousseau,et al.  Fitting models predicting dates of flowering of temperate‐zone trees using simulated annealing , 1998 .

[2]  A. Fitter,et al.  Rapid Changes in Flowering Time in British Plants , 2002, Science.

[3]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Observed changes in seasons: an overview , 2002 .

[4]  J. William Munger,et al.  Exchange of Carbon Dioxide by a Deciduous Forest: Response to Interannual Climate Variability , 1996, Science.

[5]  B. Rathcke,et al.  Phenological Patterns of Terrestrial Plants , 1985 .

[6]  Xiangming Xiao,et al.  Spatial analysis of growing season length control over net ecosystem exchange , 2005 .

[7]  Mark D. Schwartz,et al.  Green-wave phenology , 1998, Nature.

[8]  D. Helsel,et al.  Statistical methods in water resources , 2020, Techniques and Methods.

[9]  Takeshi Ohta,et al.  Climate change and extension of the Ginkgo biloba L. growing season in Japan , 2003 .

[10]  P. Reich,et al.  Predicting the effects of climate change on water yield and forest production in the northeastern United States , 1995 .

[11]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  Implementing a U.S. national phenology network , 2005 .

[12]  Heikki Hänninen,et al.  Effects of climatic change on trees from cool and temperate regions: an ecophysiological approach to modelling of bud burst phenology , 1995 .

[13]  Denis-Didier Rousseau,et al.  Selecting models to predict the timing of flowering of temperate trees: implications for tree phenology modelling , 1999 .

[14]  M. Cannell,et al.  Thermal time, chill days and prediction of budburst in Picea sitchensis , 1983 .

[15]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  Predicting the timing of budburst in temperate trees , 1992 .

[16]  S. Running,et al.  A continental phenology model for monitoring vegetation responses to interannual climatic variability , 1997 .

[17]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  Why Do Temperate Deciduous Trees Leaf Out at Different Times? Adaptation and Ecology of Forest Communities , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Pascal Yiou,et al.  Historical phenology: Grape ripening as a past climate indicator , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Andrew D. Richardson,et al.  Microclimatology of treeline spruce–fir forests in mountains of the northeastern United States , 2004 .

[20]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Regional hydrologic and carbon balance responses of forests resulting from potential climate change , 1991 .

[21]  J. Schaber,et al.  Responses of spring phenology to climate change , 2004 .

[22]  K. E. Moore,et al.  Climatic Consequences of Leaf Presence in the Eastern United States , 2001 .

[23]  P. Bernier,et al.  Predicting the date of leaf emergence for sugar maple across its native range , 2000 .

[24]  Jörg Schaber,et al.  Physiology-based phenology models for forest tree species in Germany , 2003, International journal of biometeorology.

[25]  M. D. Schwartz,et al.  Climate change and shifts in spring phenology of three horticultural woody perennials in northeastern USA , 2005, International journal of biometeorology.

[26]  Mark D. Schwartz,et al.  Changes in North American spring , 2000 .

[27]  H. Lieth Modeling the Primary Productivity of the World , 1975 .

[28]  J. Mustard,et al.  Green leaf phenology at Landsat resolution: Scaling from the field to the satellite , 2006 .

[29]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Changed plant and animal life cycles from 1952 to 2000 in the Mediterranean region , 2002 .

[30]  I. Chuine,et al.  Scaling phenology from the local to the regional level: advances from species‐specific phenological models , 2000 .

[31]  Mark D. Schwartz,et al.  Assessing satellite‐derived start‐of‐season measures in the conterminous USA , 2002 .

[32]  Richard J. Norby,et al.  Phenological responses in maple to experimental atmospheric warming and CO2 enrichment , 2003 .

[33]  C. D. Keeling,et al.  Increased activity of northern vegetation inferred from atmospheric CO2 measurements , 1996, Nature.

[34]  David W. Lee,et al.  Pigment dynamics and autumn leaf senescence in a New England deciduous forest, eastern USA , 2003, Ecological Research.

[35]  I. Chuine,et al.  A unified model for budburst of trees. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Canopy duration has little influence on annual carbon storage in the deciduous broad leaf forest , 2003 .

[37]  Annette Menzel,et al.  Growing season extended in Europe , 1999, Nature.