Human perspective on affective robotic behavior: a longitudinal study

Humans are inherently social creatures, and affect plays no small role in their social nature. We use our emotional expressions to communicate our internal state, our moods assist or hinder our interactions on a daily basis, we constantly form lasting attitudes towards others, and our personalities make us uniquely predisposed to perform certain tasks. In this paper, we present a framework under development that combines these four areas of affect to influence robotic behavior, and describe initial results of a longitudinal human-robot interaction study. The study was designed to inform the development of the framework in order to increase ease and pleasantness of human-robot interaction.

[1]  Tucker R. Balch,et al.  AuRA: principles and practice in review , 1997, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[2]  F. J. J. Buytendijk,et al.  The Mind of the Dog , 1973 .

[3]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Tutelage and Collaboration for Humanoid Robots , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[4]  P. Costa,et al.  Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. , 1996 .

[5]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Affective Computing , 1997 .

[7]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  Performance of emotional group robotic system using mass psychology , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications. IROS '97.

[8]  Masahiro Fujita,et al.  An ethological and emotional basis for human-robot interaction , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  Juan David Velásquez,et al.  An emotion-based approach to robotics , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[10]  R. Lippa.  The Nonverbal Display and Judgment of Extraversion, Masculinity, Femininity, and Gender Diagnosticity: A Lens Model Analysis , 1998 .

[11]  G. Saucier.  Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. , 1994, Journal of personality assessment.

[12]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  How to build robots that make friends and influence people , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[13]  Bruce Blumberg,et al.  Leashing the AlphaWolves: mixing user direction with autonomous emotion in a pack of semi-autonomous virtual characters , 2002, SCA '02.

[14]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Spontaneous, short-term interaction with mobile robots , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[15]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Computers are social actors: a review of current research , 1997 .

[16]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Motor Schema — Based Mobile Robot Navigation , 1989, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Experimental study on robot personality for humanoid head robot , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[18]  D. Watson.  Mood and temperament , 2000 .

[19]  R. Riggio,et al.  The display of personality in expressive movement , 1990 .

[20]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Multiagent Mission Specification and Execution , 1997, Auton. Robots.

[21]  Tomoko Koda,et al.  Agents with faces : a study on the effects of personification of software agents , 1996 .

[22]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  On TAMEing robots , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[23]  Juan David Velásquez,et al.  When Robots Weep: Emotional Memories and Decision-Making , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[24]  Michael W. Fox,et al.  The Dog Its Domestication and Behavior , 1978 .

[25]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Cooperation with a robotic assistant , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  W. Scott Neal Reilly,et al.  An Architecture for Action, Emotion, and Social Behavior , 1992, MAAMAW.

[27]  Clark Elliott,et al.  Variables Influencing the Intensity of Simulated Affective States , 1993 .

[28]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[29]  Dave Moffat,et al.  Personality Parameters and Programs , 1997, Creating Personalities for Synthetic Actors.

[30]  S. Sugano,et al.  Emotional communication between humans and the autonomous robot which has the emotion model , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[31]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..