A Simple and Efficient Protein Structure Refinement Method.

Improving the quality of a given protein structure can serve as the ultimate solution for accurate protein structure prediction, and seeking such a method is currently a challenge in computational structural biology. In order to promote and encourage much needed such efforts, CASP (Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction) has been providing an ideal computational experimental platform, where it was reported only recently (since CASP10) that systematic protein structure refinement is possible by carrying out extensive (approximately millisecond) MD simulations with proper restraints generated from the given structure. Using an explicit solvent model and much reduced positional and distance restraints than previously exercised, we propose a refinement protocol that combines a series of short (5 ns) MD simulations with energy minimization procedures. Testing and benchmarking on 54 CASP8-10 refinement targets and 34 CASP11 refinement targets shows quite promising results. Using only a small fraction of MD simulation steps (nanosecond versus millisecond), systematic protein structure refinement was demonstrated in this work, indicating that refinement of a given model can be achieved using a few hours of desktop computing.

[1]  Christopher M. Summa,et al.  Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Gert Vriend,et al.  A series of PDB related databases for everyday needs , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Jianhan Chen,et al.  Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high‐resolution refinement of protein structure? , 2007, Proteins.

[4]  Chaok Seok,et al.  Refinement of unreliable local regions in template‐based protein models , 2012, Proteins.

[5]  Alan E Mark,et al.  Mimicking the action of folding chaperones in molecular dynamics simulations: Application to the refinement of homology‐based protein structures , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  David T Jones,et al.  Evaluation of predictions in the CASP10 model refinement category , 2013, Proteins.

[7]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[8]  Chaok Seok,et al.  GalaxyRefine: protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Keehyoung Joo,et al.  Contact‐assisted protein structure modeling by global optimization in CASP11 , 2016, Proteins.

[10]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[11]  Kentaro Shimizu,et al.  Refinement of comparative models of protein structure by using multicanonical molecular dynamics simulations , 2008 .

[12]  Vahid Mirjalili,et al.  Physics‐based protein structure refinement through multiple molecular dynamics trajectories and structure averaging , 2014, Proteins.

[13]  A. Kolinski,et al.  Elastic network normal modes provide a basis for protein structure refinement. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[14]  Keehyoung Joo,et al.  Template based protein structure modeling by global optimization in CASP11 , 2016, Proteins.

[15]  Keehyoung Joo,et al.  Template‐free modeling by LEE and LEER in CASP11 , 2016, Proteins.

[16]  Björn Wallner,et al.  Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2 , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  Michael Levitt,et al.  A brighter future for protein structure prediction , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[18]  Debswapna Bhattacharya,et al.  3Drefine: Consistent protein structure refinement by optimizing hydrogen bonding network and atomic‐level energy minimization , 2013, Proteins.

[19]  Stefano Piana,et al.  Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all‐atom molecular dynamics simulations , 2012, Proteins.

[20]  D. Baker,et al.  Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Matthew P Jacobson,et al.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9 , 2011, Proteins.

[22]  K. Dill,et al.  Assessment of the protein‐structure refinement category in CASP8 , 2009, Proteins.

[23]  Christodoulos A Floudas,et al.  Princeton_TIGRESS: Protein geometry refinement using simulations and support vector machines , 2014, Proteins.

[24]  Carlos Simmerling,et al.  Improved Generalized Born Solvent Model Parameters for Protein Simulations. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[25]  Vahid Mirjalili,et al.  Protein Structure Refinement through Structure Selection and Averaging from Molecular Dynamics Ensembles. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[26]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality , 2004, Proteins.

[27]  T. Cheatham,et al.  Determination of Alkali and Halide Monovalent Ion Parameters for Use in Explicitly Solvated Biomolecular Simulations , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Improving protein template recognition by using small-angle x-ray scattering profiles. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[29]  John Moult,et al.  A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[30]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Daniel R Roe,et al.  PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for Processing and Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Data. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[32]  Keehyoung Joo,et al.  Refinement of protein termini in template‐based modeling using conformational space annealing , 2011, Proteins.

[33]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Atomic-level protein structure refinement using fragment-guided molecular dynamics conformation sampling. , 2011, Structure.