Eliciting subjective probability distributions from groups

Uncertainty analysis has become an increasingly important part of risk assessments and operations research models, and the role of expert judgment in providing information for decision making has become more useful. Decision makers often have access to more than one expert, and it is common to make the decisions on the basis of the expertise of several experts, which leads to the problem of how to combine or aggregate the experts' judgments. A number of approaches have been proposed as to how to elicit, and how to synthesize, the different experts' knowledge. We discuss a variety of models that lead to specific combination methods. The output of these methods is a “combined probability distribution,” which can be viewed as representing a summary of the current state of information regarding the uncertainty of interest. We also briefly review the psychology literature relating to group decision making, which, obviously, is relevant to behavioral aggregation.

[1]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[2]  Stan Kaplan,et al.  ‘Expert information’ versus ‘expert opinions’. Another approach to the problem of eliciting/ combining/using expert knowledge in PRA , 1992 .

[3]  G. W. Hill Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[4]  R. Clemen Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography , 1989 .

[5]  Juri Pill,et al.  The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography , 1971 .

[6]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Copula Models for Aggregating Expert Opinions , 1996, Oper. Res..

[7]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Evaluating and Combining Physicians' Probabilities of Survival in an Intensive Care Unit , 1993 .

[8]  N. Kerr,et al.  Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .

[9]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  The Assessment of Probability Distributions from Expert Opinions with an Application to Seismic Fragility Curves , 1986 .

[10]  R. L. Winkler,et al.  Unanimity and compromise among probability forecasters , 1990 .

[11]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Advances in Probability Distributions with Given Marginals , 1991 .

[12]  Dennis V. Lindley,et al.  Reconciliation of Probability Distributions , 1983, Oper. Res..

[13]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise , 1997 .

[14]  T. A. Wheeler,et al.  Use of expert judgment in NUREG--1150 , 1991 .

[15]  Christian Genest,et al.  Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography , 1986 .

[16]  P. Reagan-Cirincione,et al.  Improving the Accuracy of Group Judgment: A Process Intervention Combining Group Facilitation, Social Judgment Analysis, and Information Technology , 1994 .

[17]  Christian Genest,et al.  Modeling Expert Judgments for Bayesian Updating , 1985 .

[18]  R. L. Winkler Combining Probability Distributions from Dependent Information Sources , 1981 .

[19]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Modeling Expert Opinion Arising as a Partial Probabilistic Specification , 1995 .

[20]  Christian Genest,et al.  Allocating the weights in the linear opinion pool , 1990 .

[21]  Peter A. Morris,et al.  Decision Analysis Expert Use , 1974 .

[22]  John Quigley,et al.  Expert judgement combination using moment methods , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Lawrence D. Phillips,et al.  Group Elicitation of Probability Distributions: Are Many Heads Better Than One? , 1999 .

[24]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Calibrating and Combining Precipitation Probability Forecasts , 1987 .