Fracture parameters of interfacial crack of bimaterial under the impact loading

The impact responses of the fracture parameters of interfacial crack tip, such as energy release rate (J integral), stress intensity factors (K), crack opening displacement (COD) and T stress, under the dynamic loading condition were studied using both numerical and experimental methods. A three point bending impact test was performed with bimaterial specimens composed of aluminum and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Fracture parameters for the interfacial crack tip were calculated by a programmed post processor which used both the domain integral method and the interaction energy method. The interaction energy method showed good performance in the decomposition of stress intensity factor and the calculation of elastodynamic T stress with path independency. The phase angle of stress intensity factor varied with time. The relationship between energy release rate and phase angle at the onset of crack propagation showed unsymmetrical U shaped curve. COD showed same result with the result of stress intensity factors. The magnitude of the T stress was not enough to affect the plastic deformation. Specimens whose T stress were less than zero exhibited stable crack growth along the interface as expected in the analysis.

[1]  A. Needleman,et al.  A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING ENERGY RELEASE RATES , 1985 .

[2]  P. Leevers,et al.  Inherent stress biaxiality in various fracture specimen geometries , 1982 .

[3]  Toshio Nakamura,et al.  Computational analysis of dynamic crack propagation along a bimaterial interface , 1994 .

[4]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  Computational methods in the mechanics of fracture , 1987, International Journal of Fracture.

[5]  J. Rice,et al.  Limitations to the small scale yielding approximation for crack tip plasticity , 1974 .

[6]  Ares J. Rosakis,et al.  Quasi-static and dynamic crack growth along bimaterial interfaces: A note on crack-tip field measurements using coherent gradient sensing , 1991 .

[7]  K. Liechti,et al.  Asymmetric Shielding in Interfacial Fracture Under In-Plane Shear , 1992 .

[8]  John Lambros,et al.  Development of a dynamic decohesion criterion for subsonic fracture of the interface between two dissimilar materials , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[9]  M. Williams,et al.  On the Stress Distribution at the Base of a Stationary Crack , 1956 .

[10]  Vladimir Sladek,et al.  Integral formulation for elastodynamic T-stresses , 1997 .

[11]  H. Tippur,et al.  INTERFACIAL CRACK INITIATION UNDER QUASI‐STATIC AND DYNAMIC LOADING CONDITIONS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 1997 .

[12]  John W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dynamic Fracture Mechanics , 1990 .

[13]  A. J. Carlsson,et al.  Influence of non-singular stress terms and specimen geometry on small-scale yielding at crack tips in elastic-plastic materials , 1973 .

[14]  Y. Y. Earmme,et al.  Calculation of elastic T-stresses near interface crack tip under in-plane and anti-plane loading , 1998 .

[15]  Shigeru Aoki,et al.  On the path independent integral-Ĵ , 1980 .

[16]  James R. Rice,et al.  Elastic Fracture Mechanics Concepts for Interfacial Cracks , 1988 .

[17]  Arun Shukla,et al.  Dynamic fracture criteria for crack growth along bimaterial interfaces , 1998 .

[18]  Brian Moran,et al.  Energy release rate along a three-dimensional crack front in a thermally stressed body , 1986, International Journal of Fracture.