Player strategies: achieving breakthroughs and progressing in single-player and cooperative games

Challenge is considered to be one of the key components of game-play, where game designers face the tricky task of getting the balance right so that game-play is neither too easy nor too difficult. Through attempting in-game challenges, players experience cycles of breakdown and breakthrough, where breakthroughs involve moments of insight in which learning occurs. However, little attention has been given to how players actually overcome challenges to progress during game-play. Across two studies, we explore the ways in which players attempt to achieve breakthroughs in relation to single-player and co-located multiplayer games. We identified a number of strategies that are used by players, which illustrate how learning occurs during play. For instance, while "Experiment" involves forming an informal hypothesis, "Trial & error" occurs when the player tries to find out what, if anything, will happen when they carry out an action. These strategies are considered in relation to supporting player progress and engaging game-play when designing commercial and educational games.

[1]  William V. Wright,et al.  A Theory of Fun for Game Design , 2004 .

[2]  Kursat Cagiltay,et al.  Studying computer game learning experience through eye tracking , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[3]  Jesper Juul,et al.  A Casual Revolution: Reinventing Video Games and Their Players , 2009 .

[4]  Mike Sharples Methods for evaluating mobile learning , 2009 .

[5]  N. Lazzaro Why we Play Games: Four Keys to More Emotion without Story , 2004 .

[6]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[7]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[8]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  How does it play better?: exploring user testing and biometric storyboards in games user research , 2013, CHI.

[9]  Nicola Whitton,et al.  From the Games Industry: Ten Lessons for Game-Based Learning , 2011, Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Environ..

[10]  Shamus P. Smith,et al.  Evaluation for the Design of Experience in Virtual Environments: Modeling Breakdown of Interaction and Illusion , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990. , 1990 .

[12]  Linderoth Jonas Why gamers donʼt learn more: An ecological approach to games as learning environments , 2010 .

[13]  Norbert Pachler,et al.  Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools and research designs , 2009 .

[14]  K. Kuutti Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[15]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Designing speech and language interactions , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Fran C. Blumberg,et al.  Impasse-driven learning in the context of video games , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  William Ryan,et al.  Evaluating Interactive Entertainment using Breakdown: Understanding Embodied Learning in Video Games , 2009, DiGRA Conference.

[18]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Using extracted features to inform alignment-driven design ideas in an educational game , 2014, CHI.

[19]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Games, Learning, and 21st Century Survival Skills , 2009 .

[20]  Magy Seif El-Nasr,et al.  Understanding and evaluating cooperative games , 2010, CHI.

[21]  Jonas Linderoth,et al.  Why gamers don’t learn more: An ecological approach to games as learning environments , 2012 .

[22]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[23]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[24]  Reed Stevens,et al.  In game, In room, In world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids’ lives , 2008 .

[25]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  A systematic review of quantitative studies on the enjoyment of digital entertainment games , 2014, CHI.

[26]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  Not doing but thinking: the role of challenge in the gaming experience , 2012, CHI.

[27]  Katie Salen The ecology of games : connecting youth, games, and learning , 2008 .

[28]  M. P. Jacob Habgood,et al.  Motivating Children to Learn Effectively: Exploring the Value of Intrinsic Integration in Educational Games , 2011 .

[29]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Learning to play in digital games , 2006 .

[30]  Patrick McAndrew,et al.  Game-Play Breakdowns and Breakthroughs: Exploring the Relationship Between Action, Understanding, and Involvement , 2015, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  Ioanna Iacovides,et al.  Learning the game: breakdowns, breakthroughs and player strategies , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[32]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[33]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  What can breakdowns and breakthroughs tell us about learning and involvement experienced during game-play? , 2011 .

[34]  B. Nardi Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[35]  Yun-En Liu,et al.  The impact of tutorials on games of varying complexity , 2012, CHI.