Numerosity Estimation in Visual Stimuli in the Absence of Luminance-Based Cues

Background Numerosity estimation is a basic preverbal ability that humans share with many animal species and that is believed to be foundational of numeracy skills. It is notoriously difficult, however, to establish whether numerosity estimation is based on numerosity itself, or on one or more non-numerical cues like—in visual stimuli—spatial extent and density. Frequently, different non-numerical cues are held constant on different trials. This strategy, however, still allows numerosity estimation to be based on a combination of non-numerical cues rather than on any particular one by itself. Methodology/Principal Findings Here we introduce a novel method, based on second-order (contrast-based) visual motion, to create stimuli that exclude all first-order (luminance-based) cues to numerosity. We show that numerosities can be estimated almost as well in second-order motion as in first-order motion. Conclusions/Significance The results show that numerosity estimation need not be based on first-order spatial filtering, first-order density perception, or any other processing of luminance-based cues to numerosity. Our method can be used as an effective tool to control non-numerical variables in studies of numerosity estimation.

[1]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  N Ginsburg,et al.  Perceived numerosity, item arrangement, and expectancy. , 1978, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  Sergio Cesare Masin,et al.  Null Effect of Intramodal Stimulus-Range Variation on the Exponent for Numerousness , 1983 .

[4]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Calibrating the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[5]  Daphne Maurer,et al.  Sensitivity to first- and second-order motion and form in children and adults , 2009, Vision Research.

[6]  N Ginsburg,et al.  Measurement of visual cluster. , 1987, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Monkeys match and tally quantities across senses , 2008, Cognition.

[8]  A. Nieder Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[10]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[11]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Visual perception of texture , 2002 .

[12]  Su-Ling Yeh,et al.  A common mechanism for perceptual filling-in and motion-induced blindness , 2006, Vision Research.

[13]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[14]  L. E. Krueger,et al.  Single judgments of numerosity , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Enumeration Processes in the Primate Parietal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[16]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  How much does number matter to a monkey (Macaca mulatta)? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[17]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[18]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  The vestibular system , 2005, Current Biology.

[19]  A. Treisman,et al.  Representation of statistical properties , 2003, Vision Research.

[20]  E. Spelke,et al.  Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Global Transsaccadic Change Blindness During Scene Perception , 2003, Psychological science.

[22]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  T. Tuulmets,et al.  Occupancy model of perceived numerosity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  H. Helson,et al.  The influence of context upon the estimation of number. , 1963, The American journal of psychology.

[26]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[28]  Jüri Allik,et al.  Interactions between area and numerosity , 1988, Psychological research.

[29]  A. L. Miller,et al.  The effects of shape, size, heterogeneity, and instructional set on the judgment of visual number. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[30]  J. Simmons,et al.  Perceived numerosity as a function of array number, speed of array development, and density of array items , 1991 .

[31]  Catherine Sophian,et al.  How do people apprehend large numerosities? , 2008, Cognition.

[32]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Use of Number by Fish , 2009, PloS one.

[33]  Sara Cordes,et al.  The relative salience of discrete and continuous quantity in young infants. , 2009, Developmental science.

[34]  Miles Shuman,et al.  Computational characterization of numerosity perception and encoding , 2007 .

[35]  David A Washburn,et al.  Nonverbal Estimation during Numerosity Judgements by Adult Humans , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  L E Krueger,et al.  Perceived numerosity: A comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Z L Lu,et al.  Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[38]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[39]  F. Durgin Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited , 2008, Current Biology.

[40]  Catherine Sophian,et al.  Measuring Spatial Factors in Comparative Judgments About Large Numerosities , 2007, HCI.

[41]  W. Bevan,et al.  ASSIMILATION AND CONTRAST IN THE ESTIMATION OF NUMBER. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  J. Cantlon,et al.  Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans , 2006, Psychological science.

[43]  A. Oliva,et al.  The Representation of Simple Ensemble Visual Features Outside the Focus of Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[44]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[45]  N Ginsburg,et al.  Perceived Numerosity as a Function of Item Size , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.

[46]  B. Moreau,et al.  Ca2+-Dependent Inactivation of the Mitochondrial Ca2+ Uniporter Involves Proton Flux through the ATP Synthase , 2008, Current Biology.

[47]  R. L. Gregory,et al.  Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision , 1991, Nature.

[48]  D. Burr,et al.  Vision senses number directly. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[49]  C. Frith,et al.  The solitaire illusion: An illusion of numerosity , 1972 .

[50]  T. Indow,et al.  Scaling of dot numerosity , 1977 .

[51]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[52]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Monkeys Match the Number of Voices They Hear to the Number of Faces They See , 2005, Current Biology.

[54]  Roberto Danovaro,et al.  Exponential Decline of Deep-Sea Ecosystem Functioning Linked to Benthic Biodiversity Loss , 2008, Current Biology.

[55]  E. Viding,et al.  Brain Correlates of Non-Symbolic Numerosity Estimation in Low and High Mathematical Ability Children , 2009, PloS one.

[56]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects , 2009, Cognition.

[57]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. , 1995 .

[58]  D. Burr,et al.  A Visual Sense of Number , 2007, Current Biology.

[59]  D. Ariely Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.

[60]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[61]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[62]  Daniel Algom,et al.  Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: attention preempts automaticity. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  R. Church,et al.  Alternative representations of time, number, and rate , 1990, Cognition.

[64]  Jan B. F. van Erp,et al.  Multisensory temporal numerosity judgment , 2008, Brain Research.

[65]  Lester E. Krueger,et al.  Perceived numerosity , 1972 .

[66]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .