What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians.

OBJECTIVES To identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementing computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) in health care as perceived by clinicians. METHODS We carried out a qualitative focus group study with primary and secondary health care settings in six areas of Finland. A total of 39 interviewed physicians, of whom 22 practised in primary care and 17 in secondary care. The main outcome measures physicians' expectations, preconceived barriers and facilitators were explicitly identified by the participants during the interviews. RESULTS Identified barriers were earlier experience of dysfunctional computer systems in health care, potential harm to doctor-patient relationship, obscured responsibilities, threats to clinician's autonomy and potential extra workload due to excessive reminders. Identified facilitators were self-control of frequency and contents of CDSS and noticeable help of CDSS in clinical practice. It was easy for the physicians to think of applications and clinical topics for CDSS that could help them to avoid mistakes and improve work processes. CONCLUSIONS Physicians had relatively positive attitudes towards the idea of CDSS. They expected flexibility, individuality and reliability of the CDSS. The rather high level of computerized practices and wide use of electronic guidelines probably have paved the way for the CDSS in Finland.

[1]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes , 1998 .

[3]  O. Godefroy,et al.  Pour la pratique clinique , 2009 .

[4]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[5]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[6]  R. Barbour Using focus groups in general practice research. , 1995, Family practice.

[7]  R. Ma The role of qualitative research in broadening the ‘evidence base’ for clinical practice , 2000 .

[8]  Tim Dornan,et al.  Involving users in the design and usability evaluation of a clinical decision support system , 2002, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[9]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  David W. Bates,et al.  Synthesis of Research Paper: Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support: Making the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine a Reality , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[13]  J Topping,et al.  Analysing Qualitative Data , 1961 .

[14]  Michael D Ahearn,et al.  General practitioners' perceptions of the pharmaceutical decision‐support tools in their prescribing software , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[15]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[16]  S. McMullin,et al.  Impact of an Evidence-Based Computerized Decision Support System on Primary Care Prescription Costs , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[17]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative Research in Health Care , 1999 .

[18]  Jie Huang,et al.  Research Paper: Health Information Technology and Physician-Patient Interactions: Impact of Computers on Communication during Outpatient Primary Care Visits , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Improving general practice computer systems for patient safety: qualitative study of key stakeholders , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[20]  Martin Frischer,et al.  Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GPs' perspectives , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  R. Barbour,et al.  The role of qualitative research in broadening the 'evidence base' for clinical practice. , 2000, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[22]  C. Til Ten commandments. , 1988, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[23]  Ilkka Kunnamo,et al.  Electronic primary care guidelines with links to Cochrane reviews--EBM Guidelines. , 2005, Family practice.

[24]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Kai Zheng,et al.  Understanding technology adoption in clinical care: Clinician adoption behavior of a point-of-care reminder system , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  G. Purcell,et al.  What makes a good clinical decision support system , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.