Relating strategy and structure to flexible automation: A test of fit and performance implications

This study analyzed various strategy and structure choices to determine their fit relationship with flexible automation (FA). 1Using the moderator hypothesis, we proposed that the more strategy and structure choices complemented FA's competences, the higher would be the performance impact of FA. Data from 87 FA users indicate that quality and flexibility strategies, described as complementary to FA's strengths, interact positively with FA. Low cost strategy, described as conflicting with FA, interacts negatively. Organic structure, viewed as complementary to FA, has only main effects whereas a mechanistic structure interacts negatively. At the manufacturing level, skill diversity and team approaches, considered as complementary to FA, interact positively. While a subgroup analysis of high-low performers lends additional support to these relationships, analysis of industry subgroups indicates that some relationships are industry specific. We discuss the implications of these findings for research and practice.

[1]  David Rowe,et al.  Up and Running , 1993 .

[2]  S. Sethi,et al.  The Impact of Flexible Automation on Business Strategy and Organizational Structure , 1992 .

[3]  M. Safizadeh.  The Case of Workgroups in Manufacturing Operations , 1991 .

[4]  T. Kumpe,et al.  Manufacturing in the 1990s - productivity, flexibility and innovation , 1990 .

[5]  D. Schroeder.  A dynamic perspective on the impact of process innovation upon competitive strategies , 1990 .

[6]  Clark Kb,et al.  What strategy can do for technology. The five rules of technology leadership. , 1989 .

[7]  Christopher G. Gresov.  Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. , 1989 .

[8]  R. Kanter.  Becoming PALs: Pooling, Allying, and Linking Across Companies , 1989 .

[9]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  Manufacturing flexibility in the CAM era , 1989 .

[10]  V. Govindarajan.  A Contingency Approach to Strategy Implementation at the Business-Unit Level: Integrating Administrative Mechanisms with Strategy , 1988 .

[11]  L. Fry,et al.  Flexible manufacturing organiza-tions: implications for strategy fonnulation and organization design , 1988 .

[12]  Jerald Hage,et al.  Organizational and Technological Predictors of Change in automaticity , 1988 .

[13]  David J. Miller,et al.  Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications , 1988 .

[14]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Managing Flexible Automation , 1988 .

[15]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  Integrating Design and Manufacturing to Deploy Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 1987 .

[16]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Implementing New Manufacturing Technologies: Managerial Lessons over the FMS Life Cycle , 1987 .

[17]  Paul M. Swamidass,et al.  Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: a path analytic model , 1987 .

[18]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  The Strategic Advantages of the Factory of the Future , 1987 .

[19]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence , 1987 .

[20]  W. Mckinley.  Complexity and Administrative Intensity: The Case of Declining Organizations. , 1987 .

[21]  Danny Miller,et al.  Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure. , 1986 .

[22]  R. Jaikumar.  Postindustrial manufacturing , 1986 .

[23]  David Boddy,et al.  Managing New Technology , 1986 .

[24]  P. Adler.  New Technologies, New Skills , 1986 .

[25]  Richard B. Chase,et al.  A Sociotechnical Analysis of the Integrated Factory , 1986 .

[26]  Mariann Jelinek,et al.  Computer Integrated Flexible Manufacturing: Organizational, Economic, and Strategic Implications , 1985 .

[27]  Wickham Skinner,et al.  Manufacturing: The Formidable Competitive Weapon , 1985 .

[28]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance , 1984 .

[29]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[30]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[31]  H. J. Arnold.  Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues , 1982 .

[32]  Russell I. Fries,et al.  Patterns of Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[33]  E. H. Neilsen,et al.  The subordinate's predicaments. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[34]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[35]  S. Wheelwright.  Reflecting corporate strategy in manufacturing decisions , 1978 .

[36]  L. Franko.  The Move Toward a Multidivisional Structure in European Organizations , 1974 .

[37]  J. Child.  Predicting and Understanding Organization Structure. , 1973 .

[38]  D. Pugh,et al.  Operations Technology and Organization Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal , 1969 .

[39]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[40]  G. Chow.  Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions (econometrics voi 28 , 1960 .