Minimal marker set for center of mass estimation in running.

The purpose was to study the validity of a recently proposed method [Forsell C, Halvorsen K. A method for determining minimal sets of markers for the estimation of center of mass, linear and angular momentum. Journal of Biomechanics 2009;42(3):361-5] for estimating the trajectory of the whole-body center of mass (CoM) in the case of running at velocities ranging from 10 to 22 km h(-1). The method gives an approximation to the CoM using the position of fewer markers on the body than the standard method of tracking each segment of the body. Fourteen male athletes participated. A standard method for determining the CoM from a model of 13 segments and using the position of 36 markers was used as reference method. Leave-one-out cross-validation revealed errors that decreased with increasing number of markers used in the approximative method. Starting from four markers, the error in absolute position of the CoM decreased from 15 mm to 3 mm in each direction. For the velocity of the CoM the estimation bias was neglectable, and the random error decreased from 0.15 to 0.05 m s(-1). The inter-subject and intra-subject variability in the estimated model parameters increased with increasing number of markers. The method worked well also when applied to running at velocities outside the range of velocities in the data used to determine the model parameters. The results indicate that a model using 10 markers represents a good trade-off between simplicity and accuracy, but users must take into account requirements of their specific applications.

[1]  Kjartan Halvorsen,et al.  A method for determining minimal sets of markers for the estimation of center of mass, linear and angular momentum. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  A L Hof,et al.  The condition for dynamic stability. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  Reconstruction of skeletal movement using skin markers: comparative assessment of bone pose estimators , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Determinants of the center of mass trajectory in human walking and running. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  Lorenzo Chiari,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[6]  W. Taylor,et al.  A survey of formal methods for determining the centre of rotation of ball joints. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Novacheck,et al.  The biomechanics of running. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[8]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective. , 2007, Human movement science.

[9]  W. T. Dempster,et al.  SPACE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEATED OPERATOR, GEOMETRICAL, KINEMATIC, AND MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF THE BODY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE LIMBS , 1955 .

[10]  P. Leva Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. , 1996 .

[11]  D. Winter,et al.  Motor mechanisms of balance during quiet standing. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  Kjartan Halvorsen,et al.  Measurements of vertical displacement in running, a methodological comparison. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[13]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  10 Biomechanics of Walking and Running: Center of Mass Movements to Muscle Action , 1998, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[14]  G Baroni,et al.  Validation protocol of models for centre of mass estimation. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.