Technology-Enhanced Learning – Conclusions and Future Directions

This chapter aims to establish a positive vision for the technology-enhanced learning design field. It commences by summarizing the current state of technology-enhanced learning research, as established by the previous analysis, in order to clarify the foundations upon which the field can build. The future of learning technology is considered, in the first instance, by extrapolating trends in information and communication technologies throughout history. This process showcases how the most impactful technologies are those that bring information closer to us, support sharing, and offer more visceral learning experiences. The nature of learning technology trends occurring in recent Horizon Reports, for instance, gesture-based computing, augmented reality, Massive Open Online Courses, and table computing, are analyzed and explained in terms of Roger’s Diffusion of Innovation Theory and Gartner’s Hype Cycle. This leads to identifying teachers as the critical lynch pin in order for society to derive greatest educational benefit from the exponential advances in technology. Consequently, support for educators is argued as essential. Into the future the learning technology field will only optimize its progress if educators and researchers work together to understand design issues and possibilities. Directions forward for educators and researchers are proposed, emphasizing a research-driven, pedagogically focused, creative, and collaborative approach to technology-enhanced learning design.

[1]  Daniel Churchill,et al.  Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Collaborative learning across physical and virtual worlds: Factors supporting and constraining learners in a blended reality environment , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[3]  Lori B. Holcomb,et al.  The Use of Alternative Social Networking Sites in Higher Educational Settings: A Case Study of the E-Learning Benefits of Ning in Education , 2010 .

[4]  Mark Pegrum,et al.  Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australian independent schools , 2013 .

[5]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[6]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Comments on Greenhow, Robelia, and Hughes: Toward a Creative Social Web for Learners and Teachers , 2009 .

[7]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Scholarship of Teaching: A model , 2000 .

[8]  Thomas Donald Cochrane,et al.  Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0 , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[9]  Garry Falloon,et al.  Exploring young students' talk in iPad-supported collaborative learning environments , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[10]  T. Anderson,et al.  Design-Based Research , 2012 .

[11]  Susan McKenney Toward relevant and usable TEL research , 2015 .

[12]  Brock Craft,et al.  A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  Wan Ng,et al.  A framework for sustainable mobile learning in schools , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Matt Bower,et al.  Learning through social networking sites – the critical role of the teacher , 2012 .

[15]  H. Kanuka,et al.  The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning and the Online Classroom , 2013 .

[16]  Raija Hämäläinen,et al.  Challenge of supporting vocational learning: Empowering collaboration in a scripted 3D game - How does teachers' real-time orchestration make a difference? , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Marcus McDonald,et al.  Barriers and Enablers to the Use of Virtual Worlds in Higher Education: An Exploration of Educator Perceptions, Attitudes and Experiences , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[18]  Matt Bower,et al.  What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies? , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[20]  Jörgen Holmberg,et al.  Studying the process of educational design – revisiting Schön and making a case for reflective design-based research on teachers’ ‘conversations with situations’ , 2014 .

[21]  Ru-Chu Shih,et al.  Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning , 2011 .