Legitimately Diverse, Yet Comparable: On Synthesizing Social Inclusion Performance in the EU

The Open Method of Coordination (OMC) intends to enhance EU member states' performance with regard to social inclusion. In this context a set of commonly agreed performance indicators plays an important role. While the communicative power of a synthetic indicator has been recognised, several objections have been raised against such a construction. In this paper, we argue that a set of separate indicators can in principle be combined into one synthetic performance index without giving up on the notion of subsidiarity, and without fundamentally impairing the peer pressure incentives that constitute an important rationale for OMC. We complement the presentation of the conceptual framework with a number of empirical applications, thereby indicating how the basic method may be instrumental for policy benchmarking practice.

[1]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art , 1999 .

[2]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Benchmarking Sustainable Development : A Synthetic Meta-index Approach , 2002 .

[3]  Meghnad Desai,et al.  Human development:Concepts and measurement , 1991 .

[4]  F. Giammusso,et al.  Indicators on Poverty and Social Exclusion: Moving Toward a Social Europe? , 2002 .

[5]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Remeasuring the HDI by Data Envelopement Analysis , 2001 .

[6]  P. Pestieau,et al.  Efficiency of the welfare state , 1999 .

[7]  E. Sheldon,et al.  Social Indicators , 1975, Science.

[8]  Hans Bjurek,et al.  Benchmarking European labour market performance with efficiency frontier techniques , 2000 .

[9]  H. Welsch,et al.  Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach , 2004 .

[10]  Pierre Salmon,et al.  DECENTRALISATION AS AN INCENTIVE SCHEME , 1987 .

[11]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[12]  A. Atkinson.  Social Inclusion and the European Union , 2002 .

[13]  Joshua Cohen,et al.  Review of "Inequality Reexamined" by Amartya Sen , 1995 .

[14]  C. Simkin..  About Economic Inequality , 1998 .

[15]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models , 1995, Oper. Res. Lett..

[16]  S. Tarantola,et al.  State-of-the-art Report on Current Methodologies and Practices for Composite Indicator Development , 2002 .

[17]  A. Atkinson.  Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion , 2002 .

[18]  Paul Streeten,et al.  Human Development: Means and Ends , 1995 .

[19]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  A Statistical Test for Nested Radial Dea Models , 2002, Oper. Res..

[20]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Malmquist Productivity Indexes and Fisher Ideal Indexes , 1992 .

[21]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Bert M. Balk,et al.  The Residual: On Monitoring and Benchmarking Firms, Industries, and Economies with Respect to Productivity , 2001 .

[23]  Thierry Post,et al.  Erim Report Series Research in Management Methodological Advances in Dea: a Survey and an Application for the Dutch Electricity Sector Bibliographic Data and Classifications , 2022 .

[24]  A. Hemerijck.  The Self-Transformation of the European Social Model(s)* , 2002 .

[25]  SimarLeopold,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores , 1998 .

[26]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Welfare, Resources, and Capabilities: A Review [Inequality Reexamined] , 1993 .

[27]  D. Archibugi.  Making New Technologies Work for Human Development: United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 2001, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, July 2001, 278 pp., Price [UK pound]19.99, ISBN: 0-19-521835-3 , 2002 .

[28]  A. Atkinson.  Developing Comparable Indicators for Monitoring Social Inclusion in the European Union , 2003 .

[29]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Simulating Weights Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis by Means of Unobserved Dmus , 1998 .

[30]  Rolf Färe,et al.  An Economic Approach to Achievement and Improvement Indexes , 2001 .

[31]  Willem Moesen,et al.  Towards a synthetic indicator of macroeconomic performance: Unequal weighting when limited information is available , 1991 .

[32]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis to assess macroeconomic policy performance , 2001 .

[33]  R. Defina,et al.  The Misery Index: Only Part of the Story , 1993 .

[34]  J. Quiggin,et al.  Social indicators and comparisons of living standards , 2003 .

[35]  F. Scharpf.  Legitimate Diversity: the New Challenge of European Integration , 2002 .

[36]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[37]  F. Scharpf,et al.  The European Social Model , 2002 .

[38]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[39]  R. Erikson.  Welfare as a Planning Goal , 1974 .

[40]  T. N. Srinivasan,et al.  Human Development: A New Paradigm or Reinvention of the Wheel? , 1994 .

[41]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[42]  W.F. de Gaay Fortman.  Living Standards , 1946 .