Using experimental analysis to evaluate the influence of printed circuit board construction on the thermal performance of four package types in both natural and forced convection

As the functionality of electronic systems increase, so does the complexity of printed circuit board (PCB) design, with greater component packing densities requiring additional internal signal, power and ground layers to facilitate interconnection. The extra copper content introduced increases PCB thermal conductivity and heat spreading capability, which can strongly influence component operating temperature. Therefore, this experimental study sought to quantify the impact of PCB construction on component operating temperature and relate this sensitivity to the package design, PCB effective conductivity and convective environment. This was achieved by measuring the steady state thermal performance of four package types (PSO20: heat slug up, PSO20: heat slug down, LFBGA80 and SBGA352) on up to six different, single-component thermal test PCBs in the standard natural and forced convection environments. Test velocities ranged from 0.5 m/s to 5.0 m/s and all test components contained a thermal test die. Measurements of junction temperature and component-PCB surface temperature distributions are both presented for power dissipation levels within the range 0.5 to 6.0 Watts. The study includes the low and high conductivity JEDEC standard, FR4-based test PCBs and typical application boards. As each PCB had a different internal structure and effective thermal conductivity, this study highlights the sensitivity of component operating temperature to the PCB, provides benchmark data for validating numerical models, and helps one assess the applicability of standard junction-to-air thermal resistance (/spl theta//sub JA/ and /spl theta//sub JMA/), as well as both junction-to-board (/spl Psi//sub JB/) and junction-to-top (/spl Psi//sub JT/) thermal characterisation parameters for design purposes on nonstandard PCBs.

[1]  H. I. Rosten.  Delphi — A Status Report on the Esprit Funded Project for the Creation and Validation of Thermal Models of Electronic Parts , 1997 .

[2]  B. S. Siegal,et al.  Factors affecting semiconductor device thermal resistance measurements , 1988, Fourth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal and Temperature Measurement Symposium.

[3]  Darvin R. Edwards.  Development of JEDEC standard thermal measurement test boards , 1996, Twelfth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium. Proceedings.

[4]  J. Punch,et al.  Still-air junction-to-ambient thermal resistance of different devices as functions of the effective thermal conductivity of printed circuit boards , 1998 .

[5]  S. Gustafsson,et al.  THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY, THERMAL DIFFUSIVITY, AND SPECIFIC HEAT OF THIN SAMPLES FROM TRANSIENT MEASUREMENTS WITH HOT DISK SENSORS , 1994 .

[6]  Peter Rodgers,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER PREDICTIONS FOR SINGLE- AND MULTI-COMPONENT PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS IN A FORCED CONVECTION ENVIRONMENT: PART 2 - RESULTS AND DISCUSSION , 1999 .

[7]  Peter Rodgers,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER PREDICTIONS FOR SINGLE- AND MULTI-COMPONENT PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS IN A FORCED CONVECTION ENVIRONMENT: PART I - EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL MODELLING , 1999 .

[8]  Valerie Eveloy,et al.  Validation and application of different experimental techniques to measure electronic component operating junction temperature , 1999 .

[9]  Valter Motta.  New Jedec Standards for Thermal Measurements , 1997 .

[10]  John Lohan,et al.  On predicting the operational thermal resistance of electronic components , 1998, ITherm'98. Sixth Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (Cat. No.98CH36208).

[11]  Peter Rodgers,et al.  Impact of convective environment on the distribution of heat transfer from three electronic component package types : Operating on single- and multi-component printed Circuit boards , 1999 .

[12]  John Lohan,et al.  Effect of PCB Thermal Conductivity on the Operating Temperature of an SO-8 Package in a Natural Convection Environment: Experimental Measurement versus Numerical Prediction , 1999 .

[13]  J. Richard,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING THE CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE CONDUCTIVITY IN PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS , 1998 .

[14]  P. Stehouwer,et al.  Creation and evaluation of compact models for thermal characterisation using dedicated optimisation software , 1999, Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306).

[15]  Tien-Yu Tom Lee,et al.  THERMAL STRATEGY FOR MODELING THE WIREBONDED PBGA PACKAGES , 1999 .

[16]  J. R. Culham,et al.  Factors affecting the calculation of effective conductivity in printed circuit boards [thermal analysis] , 1998, ITherm'98. Sixth Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (Cat. No.98CH36208).

[17]  K. Azar,et al.  Experimental determination of thermal conductivity of printed wiring boards , 1996, Twelfth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium. Proceedings.

[18]  Frank P. Incropera,et al.  Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer , 1981 .

[19]  H. Pape,et al.  Generation and verification of boundary independent compact thermal models for active components according to the DELPHI/SEED methods , 1999, Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306).

[20]  B. Chambers,et al.  Application of CFD Technology to electronic thermal management , 1994 .

[21]  C. Lasance,et al.  An Experimental Method to Determine the Effective Thermal Conductivity of Printed Circuit Boards , 1994 .

[22]  J. Lohan,et al.  Experimental validation of numerical heat transfer predictions for singleand multi-component printed circuit boards in natural convection environments , 1999, Fifteenth Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium (Cat. No.99CH36306).

[23]  B. M. Guenin,et al.  Analysis of thermally-enhanced SOIC packages , 1996 .