Comparison of different methods of incorporating respiratory motion for lung cancer tumor volume delineation on PET images: a simulation study

The interest of PET complementary information for the delineation of the target volume in radiotherapy of lung cancer is increasing. However, respiratory motion requires the determination of a functional internal target volume (ITV) on PET images for which several strategies have been proposed. The purpose of this study was the comparison of these strategies for taking into account respiratory motion and deriving the ITV: (1) adding fixed margins to the volume defined on a single binned image, (2) segmenting a motion averaged image and (3) considering the union of volumes delineated on binned frames. For this third strategy, binned frames were either non-corrected for motion, or corrected using two different methods: elastic registration or super resolution. The strategies' performances were assessed on realistic simulated datasets combining the NCAT phantom with a PET Philips GEMINI scanner model in GATE, and containing various configurations of tumor to background contrast, with both regular and irregular respiratory motion (with a range of motion amplitudes). The obtained ITVs' sensitivity (SE) and positive predictive value (PVE) with respect to the known true ITV were significantly higher (from 0.8 to 0.95) than all other techniques when using binned frames corrected for motion, independently of motion regularity, amplitude, or tumor to background contrast. Although the absolute difference was small and not always significant, images corrected using super resolution led to systematically better results than using elastic registration. The worst results were obtained when using the motion averaged image for SE (around 0.5-0.6) and using the margins added to a single frame for PPV (0.6-0.7), respectively. The best strategy to account for breathing motion for tumor ITV delineation in radiotherapy planning is to rely on the use of the union of volumes delineated on super resolution-corrected binned images.

[1]  Christian Roux,et al.  A Fuzzy Locally Adaptive Bayesian Segmentation Approach for Volume Determination in PET , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Incorporating Patient-Specific Variability in the Simulation of Realistic Whole-Body $^{18}{\hbox{F-FDG}}$ Distributions for Oncology Applications , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  S. Webb,et al.  The use of PET images for radiotherapy treatment planning: an error analysis using radiobiological endpoints. , 2010, Medical physics.

[4]  E Yorke,et al.  Four-dimensional (4D) PET/CT imaging of the thorax. , 2004, Medical physics.

[5]  Peter J. Huber,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[6]  K Schnabel,et al.  18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the planning of radiotherapy in lung cancer: high impact in patients with atelectasis. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[8]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Impact of FDG-PET on radiation therapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  V. Johnson,et al.  Target definition of moving lung tumors in positron emission tomography: correlation of optimal activity concentration thresholds with object size, motion extent, and source-to-background ratio. , 2010, Medical physics.

[10]  M van Herk,et al.  Fusion of respiration-correlated PET and CT scans: correlated lung tumour motion in anatomical and functional scans , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Curtis B Caldwell,et al.  Can PET provide the 3D extent of tumor motion for individualized internal target volumes? A phantom study of the limitations of CT and the promise of PET. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  P. Green Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[14]  R. Lecomte,et al.  Respiratory gating for 3-dimensional PET of the thorax: feasibility and initial results. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  [4D-CT scan and radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: role in the definition of internal target volume (ITV)]. , 2011, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[16]  S. Rafla,et al.  The contribution of integrated PET/CT to the evolving definition of treatment volumes in radiation treatment planning in lung cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Accurate automatic delineation of heterogeneous functional volumes in positron emission tomography for oncology applications. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Ross Berbeco,et al.  Evaluation of the combined effects of target size, respiratory motion and background activity on 3D and 4D PET/CT images , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[20]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Super-Resolution in Respiratory Synchronized Positron Emission Tomography , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  D. Visvikis,et al.  RTNCAT (Real Time NCAT): Implementing Real Time physiological movement of voxellized phantoms in GATE , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[22]  A J Reader,et al.  List-mode-based reconstruction for respiratory motion correction in PET using non-rigid body transformations , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Michalis Aristophanous,et al.  Clinical utility of 4D FDG-PET/CT scans in radiation treatment planning. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Moon Gi Kang,et al.  Super-resolution image reconstruction , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010).

[25]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  PET-CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  I. Buvat,et al.  A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Michalis Aristophanous,et al.  Four-dimensional positron emission tomography: implications for dose painting of high-uptake regions. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  S. Senan,et al.  Defining target volumes for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of early-stage lung tumours: a comparison of three-dimensional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography. , 2012, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[29]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  PET functional volume delineation: a robustness and repeatability study , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[30]  B.M.W. Tsui,et al.  Improved Dynamic Cardiac Phantom Based on 4D NURBS and Tagged MRI , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[31]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Therapeutic implications of molecular imaging with PET in the combined modality treatment of lung cancer. , 2011, Cancer treatment reviews.

[32]  F. Mornex,et al.  [4D-CT scan and radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: role in the definition of internal target volume (ITV)]. , 2011, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[33]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Impact of Tumor Size and Tracer Uptake Heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET and CT Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumor Delineation , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Reduction of observer variation using matched CT-PET for lung cancer delineation: a three-dimensional analysis. , 2006, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[35]  D. Visvikis,et al.  The role of PET/CT scanning in radiotherapy planning. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[36]  D. Visvikis,et al.  Comparison between reconstruction-incorporated super-resolution and super-resolution as a post-processing step for motion correction in PET , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[37]  C. L. Le Rest,et al.  Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation of the Philips Allegro/GEMINI PET systems using GATE , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  R Laforest,et al.  Generating lung tumor internal target volumes from 4D-PET maximum intensity projections. , 2011, Medical physics.

[39]  A J Reader,et al.  Respiratory motion correction for PET oncology applications using affine transformation of list mode data , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. , 2006, Medical physics.

[41]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. , 2006, Medical physics.

[42]  John W. Clark,et al.  A motion-incorporated reconstruction method for gated PET studies , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  John W. Clark,et al.  Comparison between two super-resolution implementations in PET imaging. , 2009, Medical physics.