Three of the most common methods (two with parallel flow and one with radial flow) for determination of the in-plane permeability tensor are studied both theoretically and experimentally. An error analysis shows that the difference between the methods is negligible if the error levels are equal. However, the radial flow method is found to be susceptible to large errors from mold deflection in an experimental comparison between the methods. Additional experiments with the radial flow method in a stiffer mold show that the method gives the same values for the permeability tensor as the other two methods. A new method with multiple cavities in parallel is proposed that combines the simplicity of the radial flow method with the stiff mold of the parallel flow method. Only mass and time need to be measured in one experiment and it eliminates the need to measure fluid viscosity, temperature, and injection pressure. The method depends on the availability of a reference material with known permeability.
[1]
John C. Berg,et al.
Simultaneous measurements of permeability and capillary pressure of thermosetting matrices in woven fabric reinforcements
,
1991
.
[2]
Ludwig Rebenfeld,et al.
Radial penetration of a viscous liquid into a planar anisotropic porous medium
,
1988
.
[3]
F. Pesando.
Oikos e ktesis : la casa greca in età classica
,
1990
.
[4]
B. R. Gebart,et al.
Permeability of Unidirectional Reinforcements for RTM
,
1992
.
[5]
S. Whitaker.
Flow in porous media I: A theoretical derivation of Darcy's law
,
1986
.
[6]
S. J. Wineman,et al.
Consolidation Experiments for Laminate Composites
,
1987
.