Assessing the relative efficiency of Chinese high-tech industries: a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach

The high-tech industry in China has largely developed in recent decades. To provide a basis for the sustainable development of high-tech industry, the government should evaluate its performance to find out its strengths and weaknesses that are critical for the future improvement of business operations. Dynamic network data envelopment analysis has received considerable attention from researchers evaluating the performance of a system during long-term production. However, studies on the issue of shared outputs caused by the lagged production effect of inputs are rare. In a real high-tech industry, the outputs during a production period are derived from the inputs in that production period and also from the inputs in the previous period. These intertemporal shared outputs in a system cannot be easily divided into different periods. Thus, a new dynamic two-stage data envelopment analysis approach is proposed to measure the efficiency of such system with a two-stage structure and shared outputs. We divide a high-tech activity system into two stages: technology research and development stage and technology digestion and absorption stage, where intertemporal shared outputs occur. Empirical results from our approach indicate that Chinese high-tech industries are weak in the technology digestion and absorption stage. Finally, suggestions are provided to improve the overall efficiency of Chinese high-tech industries.

[1]  Qian Liu,et al.  A stochastic DEA model considering undesirable outputs with weak disposability , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[2]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Data envelopment analysis and its related linear programming models , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition , 2008 .

[4]  Maoguo Wu,et al.  Efficiency evaluation of banks in China: A dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure approach , 2016 .

[5]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Estimation of the efficiency of Japanese hospitals using a dynamic and network data envelopment analysis model , 2014, Health care management science.

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Data envelopment analysis : a handbook on the modeling of internal structures and networks , 2014 .

[7]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[8]  Jie Wu,et al.  Closest target for the orientation-free context-dependent DEA under variable returns to scale , 2018, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  A. Hashimoto,et al.  Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry , 2008 .

[10]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Dynamic performance assessment of bus transit with the multi-activity network structure , 2016 .

[11]  Yan Yang,et al.  Similarity and entropy measures for hesitant fuzzy sets , 2018, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[12]  Tao Jie,et al.  A study of the operation efficiency and cost performance indices of power-supply companies in China based on a dynamic network slacks-based measure model , 2016 .

[13]  Nickolaos G. Tzeremes,et al.  A unified classification of two-stage DEA models , 2014 .

[14]  B. Golany A note on including ordinal relations among multipliers in data envelopment analysis , 1988 .

[15]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[16]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Super SBI Dynamic Network DEA approach to measuring efficiency in the provision of public services , 2018, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[17]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Taehan Lee,et al.  A multi-period output DEA model with consistent time lag effects , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[19]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  An illustration of dynamic network DEA in commercial banking including robustness tests , 2015 .

[20]  Jie Wu,et al.  Target intermediate products setting in a two-stage system with fairness concern , 2017 .

[21]  R. Färe,et al.  Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA , 1996 .

[22]  Yao Chen,et al.  Equivalent solutions to additive two-stage network data envelopment analysis , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Lan-bing Li,et al.  Efficiency evaluation of the regional high-tech industry in China: A new framework based on meta-frontier dynamic DEA analysis , 2017 .

[25]  Shouyang Wang,et al.  Measuring efficiencies of multi-period and multi-division systems associated with DEA: An application to OECD countries' national innovation systems , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach , 2013 .

[27]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[28]  Liu Zhi-ying,et al.  An Empirical Analysis on Technical Efficiency of China's Hi-Tech Industry , 2007 .

[29]  Walter Ukovich,et al.  A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the Decision Making Units is considered , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[30]  Hirofumi Fukuyama,et al.  Estimating two-stage network Slacks-based inefficiency: An application to Bangladesh banking , 2013 .

[31]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  On comparison of different sets of units used for improving the frontier in DEA models , 2017 .

[33]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Measuring the innovation production process: A cross-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovations , 2010 .

[34]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  DYNAMIC NETWORK RANGE-ADJUSTED MEASURE VS. DYNAMIC NETWORK SLACKS-BASED MEASURE , 2014 .

[35]  Pamela Murray-Tuite,et al.  A multi-perspective dynamic network performance efficiency measurement of an evacuation: A dynamic network-DEA approach , 2016 .

[36]  Fanyong Meng,et al.  Interval cross efficiency for fully ranking decision making units using DEA/AHP approach , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[37]  Ling-Feng Hsieh,et al.  A performance evaluation model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan—An application of the relational network DEA , 2010 .

[38]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Returns to growth in a nonparametric DEA approach , 2012, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[39]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Measuring dynamic efficiency: Theories and an integrated methodology , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Jordi Jaumandreu,et al.  Firms' age, process innovation and productivity growth , 2004 .

[41]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Productivity in China's high technology industry: Regional heterogeneity and R&D , 2011 .

[42]  Fanyong Meng,et al.  A new approach for fair efficiency decomposition in two-stage structure system , 2018, Oper. Res..

[43]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Network data envelopment analysis: A review , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  WangShouyang,et al.  Measuring efficiencies of multi-period and multi-division systems associated with DEA , 2016 .

[45]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems , 2012 .

[47]  Bou-Wen Lin,et al.  Evaluating the development of high-tech industries: Taiwan's science park , 2006 .

[48]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .