Differences in the timing of reproduction between urban and forest European blackbirds (Turdus merula): result of phenotypic flexibility or genetic differences?

Species which have settled in urban environments are exposed to different conditions from their wild conspecifics. A previous comparative study of an urban and a forest–living European blackbird population had revealed a three weeks earlier onset of gonadal growth in urban individuals. These physiological adjustments are either the result of genetic differences that have evolved during the urbanization process, or of phenotypic flexibility resulting from the bird's exposure to the different environmental conditions of town or forest. To identify which of these two mechanisms causes the differences in reproductive timing, hand–reared birds originating from the urban and the forest populations were kept in identical conditions. The substantial differences in the timing of reproduction between urban and forest birds known from the field did not persist under laboratory conditions, indicating that temporal differences in reproductive timing between these two populations are mainly a result of phenotypic flexibility. Nevertheless, urban males initiated plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and testicular development earlier than forest males in their first reproductive season. Moreover, plasma LH concentration and follicle size declined earlier in urban females than in forest females, suggesting that genetic differences are also involved and might contribute to the variations in the timing of reproduction in the wild.

[1]  W. Hamner.  Photoperiodic control of the annual testicular cycle in the house finch , 1966 .

[2]  H. Sukopp,et al.  Urban Ecology — Scientific and Practical Aspects , 1998 .

[3]  B. Silverin,et al.  Low Temperatures Affect the Photoperiodically Induced LH and Testicular Cycles Differently in Closely Related Species of Tits (Parus spp.) , 1994, Hormones and Behavior.

[4]  D. Farner,et al.  Relationship between migratory disposition and plasma levels of gonadotrophins and steroid hormones in the European blackbird , 1984, Naturwissenschaften.

[5]  E. Gwinner.  ZOOPHYSIOLOGY VOL. 18. CIRCANNUAL RHYTHMS ENDOGENOUS ANNUAL CLOCKS IN THE ORGANIZATION OF SEASONAL PROCESSES , 1986 .

[6]  N. Westwood,et al.  Avian Breeding Cycles , 1978 .

[7]  D. Farner,et al.  The Effect of Light Intensity and Day Length on Reproduction in the English Sparrow , 1952 .

[8]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  Photoperiodic Control of Seasonality in Birds , 2001, Journal of biological rhythms.

[9]  J. Partecke,et al.  Underlying physiological control of reproduction in urban and forest-dwelling European blackbirds Turdus merula , 2005 .

[10]  J. Wingfield,et al.  Effects of temperature on photoperiodically induced reproductive development, circulating plasma luteinizing hormone and thyroid hormones, body mass, fat deposition and molt in mountain white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys oriantha. , 2003, General and comparative endocrinology.

[11]  J. Wingfield,et al.  Interrelationship of day length and temperature on the control of gonadal development, body mass, and fat score in white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii. , 1996, General and comparative endocrinology.

[12]  J. Wingfield,et al.  Effects of day length and temperature on gonadal development, body mass, and fat depots in white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys pugetensis. , 1997, General and comparative endocrinology.

[13]  L. Batten.  Population Dynamics of Suburban Blackbirds , 1973 .

[14]  A. Dawson.  The effect of restricting the daily period of food availability on testicular growth of Starlings , 2008 .

[15]  E. Svensson.  Avian reproductive timing: when should parents be prudent? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  S. Boutin.  Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future , 1990 .

[17]  Robert A. Lewis,et al.  Chapter 8 – PHOTOPERIODISM AND REPRODUCTIVE CYCLES IN BIRDS*,† , 1971 .

[18]  S. Daan,et al.  Food Supply and the Annual Timing of Avian Reproduction , 1989 .

[19]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[20]  J. Blondel,et al.  Adaptive differences in the timing of egg laying between different populations of birds result from variation in photoresponsiveness , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  J. Wingfield,et al.  Environmental predictability and control of gonadal cycles in birds , 1992 .

[22]  A. Goldsmith,et al.  Photorefractoriness in birds and comparison with mammals. , 1988, Physiological reviews.

[23]  K. Stokkan,et al.  Photoperiodic adaptation to breeding at different latitudes in great tits. , 1993, General and comparative endocrinology.

[24]  D. Lack,et al.  Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds , 1969 .

[25]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Natural Selection in the Wild. , 1987 .

[26]  P. Tatner.  The breeding biology of magpies Pica pica in an urban environment , 1982 .

[27]  J. Wingfield,et al.  Avian Endocrinology: Field Investigations and Methods , 1976 .

[28]  C. Fox,et al.  Maternal effects as adaptations , 1998 .

[29]  B. Follett,et al.  A radioimmunoassay for avian luteinizing hormone. , 1972, The Journal of endocrinology.

[30]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[31]  B. Silverin,et al.  Influence of the Opposite Sex on Photoperiodically Induced LH and Gonadal Cycles in the Willow Tit (Parus montanus) , 1995, Hormones and Behavior.