Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South Carolina

Losses from environmental hazards have escalated in the past decade, prompting a reorientation of emergency management systems away from simple postevent response. There is a noticeable change in policy, with more emphasis on loss reduction through mitigation, preparedness, and recovery programs. Effective mitigation of losses from hazards requires hazard identification, an assessment of all the hazards likely to affect a given place, and risk-reduction measures that are compatible across a multitude of hazards. The degree to which populations are vulnerable to hazards, however, is not solely dependent upon proximity to the source of the threat or the physical nature of the hazard –social factors also play a significant role in determining vulnerability. This paper presents a method for assessing vulnerability in spatial terms using both biophysical and social indicators. A geographic information system was utilized to establish areas of vulnerability based upon twelve environmental threats and eight social characteristics for our study area, Georgetown County, South Carolina. Our results suggest that the most biophysically vulnerable places do not always spatially intersect with the most vulnerable populations. This is an important finding because it reflects the likely ‘social costs’ of hazards on the region. While economic losses might be large in areas of high biophysical risk, the resident population also may have greater safety nets (insurance, additional financial resources) to absorb and recover from the loss quickly. Conversely, it would take only a moderate hazard event to disrupt the well-being of the majority of county residents (who are more socially vulnerable, but perhaps do not reside in the highest areas of biophysical risks) and retard their longer-term recovery from disasters. This paper advances our theoretical and conceptual understanding of the spatial dimensions of vulnerability. It further highlights the merger of conceptualizations of human environment relationships with geographical techniques in understanding contemporary public policy issues.

[1]  Harlan H. Barrows GEOGRAPHY AS HUMAN ECOLOGY , 1923 .

[2]  Robert Brodie INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS , 1942 .

[3]  G. Rogers The History Of Georgetown County, South Carolina , 1970 .

[4]  Ian Burton,et al.  The hazardousness of a place: A regional ecology of damaging events , 1971 .

[5]  South Carolina Statistical Abstract '98 , 1972 .

[6]  Gilbert F. White,et al.  Assessment Of Research On Natural Hazards , 1975 .

[7]  B. Wisner,et al.  Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters , 1976, Nature.

[8]  Burton Al The environment as hazard , 1978 .

[9]  William I. Torry Hazards, hazes and holes: a critique of the environment as hazard and general reflections on disaster research , 1979 .

[10]  J. Norwine,et al.  Geography as human ecology , 1980 .

[11]  M. Douglas,et al.  Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers , 1983 .

[12]  R. Kates,et al.  Comparative risk analysis of technological hazards (a review). , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  K. Hewitt Interpretations of Calamity , 1984 .

[14]  Jeanne X. Kasperson,et al.  Perilous Progress: Managing The Hazards Of Technology , 1985 .

[15]  James H. Johnson,et al.  Evacuation planning for technological hazards: An emerging imperative , 1986 .

[16]  A. Kuklinksi Geography, resources and environment , 1987 .

[17]  Enrico L Quarantelli,et al.  Disaster Studies: An Analysis of the Social Historical Factors Affecting the Development of Research in the Area , 1987, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[18]  Harold Brookfield,et al.  Land degradation and society , 1988 .

[19]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[20]  E. D. Copenhaver,et al.  Impacts of hazardous technology: The psycho-social effects of restarting TMI-1 , 1988 .

[21]  S. Cutter,et al.  THE NATIONAL PATTERN OF AIRBORNE TOXIC RELEASES , 1989 .

[22]  Risa Palm,et al.  Natural Hazards: An Integrative Framework for Research and Planning , 1989 .

[23]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  A Contextual Model of Natural Hazard , 1989 .

[24]  Robert B McMaster,et al.  Modeling community vulnerability to hazardous materials using geographic information systems , 1990 .

[25]  S. Cutter,et al.  CHEMICAL HAZARDS IN URBAN AMERICA , 1991 .

[26]  D. Alexander,et al.  Natural disasters: a framework for research and teaching. , 1991, Disasters.

[27]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  The Effects of Ethnicity on Evacuation Decision-Making , 1991, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[28]  R. Platt,et al.  Lifelines: An Emergency Management Priority for the United States in the 1990s , 1991 .

[29]  S. Krimsky,et al.  Social Theories of Risk , 1992 .

[30]  K. Dow,et al.  Exploring differences in our common future(s): the meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change , 1992 .

[31]  John H. Sorensen,et al.  An approach for deriving emergency planning zones for chemical munitions emergencies , 1992 .

[32]  Walter B. Edgar South Carolina a History , 1992 .

[33]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  Citizen Participation in Emergency Response Following the Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1992, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[34]  Yue-Hong Chou,et al.  Management of wildfires with a geographical information system , 1992, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[35]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  Living with Risk: The Geography of Technological Hazards , 1993 .

[36]  B Yarnal Socio-economic restructuring and vulnerability to environmental hazards in Bulgaria. , 1994, Disasters.

[37]  T. Downing,et al.  Climate change and social vulnerability: Toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity , 1994 .

[38]  B. Wisner,et al.  At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters , 1996 .

[39]  P. Dasgupta Population, Poverty and the Local Environment , 1995 .

[40]  S. Cutter,et al.  The forgotten casualties: women, children, and environmental change. , 1995, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[41]  G. F. Hepner,et al.  A GIS-based sensitivity analysis of community vulnerability to hazardous contaminants on the Mexico/U.S. border , 1995 .

[42]  R. Platt,et al.  Sharing the Challenge: Floodplain Management into the 21st Century , 1995 .

[43]  Saundra K. Schneider Flirting with Disaster: Public Management in Crisis Situations , 1995 .

[44]  J. K. Mitchell,et al.  The long road to recovery : community responses to industrial disaster , 1996 .

[45]  Andrew A. Lovett,et al.  Assessing Hazardous Waste Transport Risks Using a GIS , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[46]  Jeanne X. Kasperson,et al.  Regions at risk : comparisons of threatened environments , 1996 .

[47]  S. Cutter Vulnerability to environmental hazards , 1996 .

[48]  Alice Fothergill,et al.  Gender, Risk, and Disaster , 1996, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[49]  Mark Monmonier,et al.  Cartographies of Danger: Mapping Hazards in America , 1997 .

[50]  Richard L. Church,et al.  Modelling Community Evacuation Vulnerability Using GIS , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[51]  Kenneth Hewitt,et al.  Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters , 1997 .

[52]  Graham A. Tobin,et al.  Natural Hazards: Explanation and Integration , 1997 .

[53]  D Alexander,et al.  The study of natural disasters, 1977-1997: some reflection on a changing field of knowledge. , 1997, Disasters.

[54]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Adoption and Implementation of Hazard Adjustments , 1997 .

[55]  D. Ball Regions of Risk: a Geographical Introduction to Disasters , 1998 .

[56]  Risa Palm,et al.  Illusions Of Safety: Culture And Earthquake Hazard Response In California And Japan , 1998 .

[57]  L. Pulido Rethinking Environmental Racism: White Privilege and Urban Development in Southern California , 2000 .

[58]  Stefan Dercon,et al.  Assessing vulnerability , 2001 .

[59]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  Forest impact estimated with NOAA AVHRR and Landsat TM data related to an empirical hurricane wind-field distribution , 2001 .