Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Fallacy of the popular methods

The fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (fuzzy AHP) is a very popular decision making method and literally thousands of papers have been published about it. However, we find the basic logic of this approach has problems. From its methodology, the definition and operational rules of fuzzy numbers not only oppose the main logic of fuzzy set theory, but also oppose the basic principles of the AHP. In dealing with the outcomes, fuzzy AHP does not give a generally accepted method to rank fuzzy numbers and a way to check the validity of the results. Besides, we discuss the validity of the Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process (AHP/ANP) in complex and uncertain environments and find that fuzzy ANP is a false proposition because there is no fuzzy priority in the super matrix which provides the basis for the ANP. Although fuzzy AHP has been applied in many cases and cited hundreds of times, we hoped that those who use fuzzy AHP would understand the problems associated with this method.

[1]  Cheng-Ru Wu,et al.  Applying a fuzzy analytic network process to construct a purchase project. A case for the purchase of a slicing diamond cutting machine , 2007 .

[2]  Bo Feng,et al.  Ranking L-R fuzzy number based on deviation degree , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[3]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[4]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[5]  R. P. Mohanty,et al.  A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: A case study , 2005 .

[6]  R. Yager,et al.  On ranking fuzzy numbers using valuations , 1999 .

[7]  L. C. Leung,et al.  On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Nils Brunsson My own book review : The Irrational Organization , 2014 .

[9]  Ali Fuat Guneri,et al.  A fuzzy ANP approach to shipyard location selection , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[11]  P. Sevastianov Numerical methods for interval and fuzzy number comparison based on the probabilistic approach and Dempster-Shafer theory , 2007 .

[12]  J. Buckley Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers , 1985 .

[13]  Didier Dubois,et al.  The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: Old techniques and new directions , 2011, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Lidija Zadnik Stirn,et al.  Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[16]  Ching-Hsue Cheng Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function , 1997 .

[17]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts , 2011 .

[18]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[19]  Saeid Abbasbandy,et al.  A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers , 2009, Comput. Math. Appl..

[20]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  T. Saaty Eigenvector and logarithmic least squares , 1990 .

[22]  T. Saaty Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[23]  James J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  B. Asady,et al.  The revised method of ranking LR fuzzy number based on deviation degree , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[26]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Hierarchical analysis of behavior in competition: Prediction in chess , 1980 .

[27]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[28]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[29]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Decision-making in fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[30]  J. Dyer Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[31]  Yang Yang,et al.  A Fuzzy ANP-Based Approach to Evaluate Region Agricultural Drought Risk , 2011 .

[32]  Keyu Zhu,et al.  The Invalidity of Triangular Fuzzy AHP - A Mathematical Justification , 2012 .

[33]  Saeid Abbasbandy,et al.  Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance , 2006, Inf. Sci..

[34]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[35]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Mashaallah Mashinchi,et al.  Ranking fuzzy numbers based on the areas on the left and the right sides of fuzzy number , 2011, Comput. Math. Appl..

[37]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games And Decisions , 1958 .

[38]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the measurement of intengibles. a principal Eigenvector approach to relative measurement derived from paired comparisons , 2013 .

[39]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[40]  Jennifer Shang,et al.  The Triangular Fuzzy AHP: Fallacy of the Popular Extent Analysis Method , 2012 .

[41]  T. Saaty There is no mathematical validity for using fuzzy number crunching in the analytic hierarchy process , 2006 .

[42]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Fuzzy Judgments and Fuzzy Sets , 2010, Int. J. Strateg. Decis. Sci..

[43]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (II) , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[44]  Gang Kou,et al.  A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..