The influence of rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on intentional set switching

High frequency (HF) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has an excitatory effect on neurons of a specific brain area. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been associated with executive functions, such as task set switching. One important experimental paradigm for investigating such higher order cognitive control is the task-switching (TS) paradigm. A TS paradigm requires switching between two conditional response tasks with mutually incompatible response–selection rules. In the present study, the influence of HF rTMS over the right DLPFC in healthy female volunteers on a modified TS paradigm was investigated. As expected, reaction time on cued switching trials decreased significant after rTMS, as compared to non-cued switch trials. No changes emerged after the placebo sham condition. Mood remained unchanged after rTMS. These findings demonstrate the role of the right DLPFC in cued intentional set switch initiation.

[1]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  N. Meiran,et al.  Component Processes in Task Switching , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  K. A. Hadland,et al.  Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Grafman,et al.  Dissociating the roles of the rostral anterior cingulate and the lateral prefrontal cortices in performing two tasks simultaneously or successively. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  K. Berman,et al.  Fractionating the neural substrate of cognitive control processes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. Raedt,et al.  Diversity, dispersion and inconsistency of reaction time measures: effects of age and task complexity , 2006, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[9]  A. Damasio.  The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  T. Hergueta,et al.  The mini international neuropsychiatric interview , 1998, European Psychiatry.

[11]  L. Leyman,et al.  The influence of rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on Stroop task performance , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[14]  M. Brass,et al.  Internally generated and directly cued task sets: an investigation with fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  L. Leyman,et al.  Lack of impact of repetitive High Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on mood in healthy female subjects. , 2006, Journal of affective disorders.

[16]  HighWire Press.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[17]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Selection for Cognitive Control: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Selection of Task-Relevant Information , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  A C Nobre,et al.  Components of attentional set-switching. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[19]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The role of response requirements in task switching: dissolving the residue , 2004, Neuroreport.

[20]  R. de Raedt,et al.  Attentional processes discriminate between patients with mild Alzheimer's disease and cognitively healthy elderly , 2006, International Psychogeriatrics.

[21]  D. Sheehan,et al.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. , 1998, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[22]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  Components of Switching Intentional Set , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  B. Turetsky,et al.  Behavioral and physiological findings of gender differences in global-local visual processing , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  N. Brooks.  Reaction Time and Attention after Closed Head Injury , 1982 .

[25]  N. Cohen,et al.  The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Modulation of brain activity by selective task sets observed using event-related potentials , 2005, Neuropsychologia.