Equivalent outcomes of ultra-congruent and standard cruciate-retaining inserts in total knee arthroplasty

[1]  O. Mathiesen,et al.  Minimal clinically important differences in randomised clinical trials on pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. , 2021, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2]  V. Antoci,et al.  Comparing patient reported outcomes in depuy sigma curved versus curved plus polyethylene inserts in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. , 2021, Journal of orthopaedics.

[3]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Midterm Outcomes and Survivorship of Anterior Stabilized Versus Cruciate Retaining Bearing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  W. Hozack,et al.  Functional Outcomes are Comparable Between Posterior Stabilized and Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty Designs at Short-Term Follow-up. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  P. Meshram,et al.  Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty: review of terminologies, methods and proposed values , 2020, Knee Surgery & Related Research.

[6]  C. Vangsness,et al.  Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported shoulder outcomes. , 2020, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[7]  J. de Vries,et al.  Do dissatisfied patients have unrealistic expectations? A systematic review and best-evidence synthesis in knee and hip arthroplasty patients , 2020, EFORT open reviews.

[8]  Alex H. S. Harris,et al.  Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals. , 2020, JAMA surgery.

[9]  Seung-Baik Kang,et al.  Anterior-stabilized TKA is inferior to posterior-stabilized TKA in terms of postoperative posterior stability and knee flexion in osteoarthritic knees: a prospective randomized controlled trial with bilateral TKA , 2020, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[10]  J. Meding,et al.  Progressive Tibial Bearing Sagittal Plane Conformity in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  L. Mandl,et al.  Comparison of Expectations and Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis Versus Osteoarthritis Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  P. James,et al.  Sagittal radius of curvature, trochlea design and ultracongruent insert in total knee arthroplasty , 2019, EFORT open reviews.

[13]  Y. Moon,et al.  Gradual change in knee extension following total knee arthroplasty using ultracongruent inserts. , 2019, The Knee.

[14]  N. Clement,et al.  Early functional outcomes after condylar-stabilizing (deep-dish) versus standard bearing surface for cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty , 2019, Knee Surgery & Related Research.

[15]  A. Lizaur-Utrilla,et al.  Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores , 2019, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[16]  Benjamin M. Stronach,et al.  The Effect of Sacrificing the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Total Knee Arthroplasties That Use a Highly Congruent Polyethylene Component. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  M. Maltenfort,et al.  How Much Pain Is Significant? Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Visual Analog Scale for Pain After Total Joint Arthroplasty. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  Y. Shin,et al.  Posterior-stabilized inserts are preferable to cruciate-substituting ultracongruent inserts due to more favourable kinematics and stability , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[19]  J. Lützner,et al.  Different intraoperative kinematics, stability, and range of motion between cruciate-substituting ultracongruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[20]  J. Seon,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty using ultra-congruent inserts can provide similar stability and function compared with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty , 2017, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[21]  H. Pandit,et al.  Gait Parameters and Functional Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Persona Knee System With Cruciate Retaining and Ultracongruent Knee Inserts. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  M. Iosifidis,et al.  Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: How much of the PCL is really retained? , 2017, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[23]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting ultra-congruent insert. , 2016, Annals of translational medicine.

[24]  R. Meneghini,et al.  Component choices in primary knee arthroplasty , 2015 .

[25]  J. Currier,et al.  Does Increased Topside Conformity in Modular Total Knee Arthroplasty Lead to Increased Backside Wear? , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  S. Kirschner,et al.  Similar stability and range of motion between cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting ultracongruent insert total knee arthroplasty , 2015, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[27]  Jiming Liu,et al.  Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[28]  C. Peters,et al.  Comparison of Total Knee Arthroplasty With Highly Congruent Anterior-stabilized Bearings versus a Cruciate-retaining Design , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  D. Saragaglia,et al.  Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years' follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases. , 2013, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[30]  R. Burnett,et al.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty is affected by their general physical well-being , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[31]  A. Johnson,et al.  Comparison of 2 polyethlene inserts for a new cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty prosthesis. , 2013, Orthopedics.

[32]  J. Bellemans,et al.  Partial resection of the PCL insertion site during tibial preparation in cruciate-retaining TKA , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[33]  Walter Heindel,et al.  Highly conforming polyethylene inlays reduce the in vivo variability of knee joint kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. , 2012, The Knee.

[34]  J. Theis,et al.  The effect of sagittal laxity on function after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[35]  I. Hozo,et al.  Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[36]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Flat vs. concave tibial joint surface in total knee arthroplasty: Randomized evaluation of 39 cases using radiostereometry , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[37]  A. Hofmann,et al.  Posterior stabilization in total knee arthroplasty with use of an ultracongruent polyethylene insert. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[38]  T. Thornhill,et al.  Posterior cruciate supplementing total knee replacement using conforming inserts and cruciate recession. Effect on range of motion and radiolucent lines. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.