Optimal lateral aseismic performance analysis of mega-substructure system with modularized secondary structures

Summary A major type of mega-substructure system is yet to fulfill its full potential of vibration control because of the fragility originating from excessive inter-story drift of its secondary structures during earthquake. We propose an innovative subtype of mega-substructure system to overcome this fragility and further improve its lateral aseismic performance. This subtype takes advantage of modular construction techniques. The secondary structures, which consist of suspended discrete modules, provide protection to nonstructural members against excessive inter-story drift. Additionally, springs that provide inter-story stiffness remain elastic. These effects extend the inter-story drift limit of secondary structure and make sufficient relative motion possible. We carried out single-objective and dual-objective optimizations to derive optimum parameters and capture the potentials of representative models. Mean square responses under power spectral density functions of ground acceleration were set as optimization objectives. It is shown that the proposed systems further suppress the response of primary structure at the expense of additional response of secondary structure, which can be accommodated by the aforementioned protection effect. Mechanisms are revealed in the perspective of transfer function curves. Robustness and time history performances are also verified.

[1]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  A comparison between different optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers design , 2010 .

[2]  G. B. Warburton,et al.  Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters , 1982 .

[3]  Akira Nishitani,et al.  Optimum design of tuned mass damper floor system integrated into bending‐shear type building based on H∞, H2, and stability maximization criteria , 2015 .

[4]  R. Mark Lawson,et al.  Application of Modular Construction in High-Rise Buildings , 2012 .

[5]  G. B. Warburton,et al.  Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems , 1980 .

[6]  Halil Sezen,et al.  Evaluation, modeling, and analysis of shipping container building structures , 2012 .

[7]  Akira Nishitani,et al.  Seismic vibration control of building structures with multiple tuned mass damper floors integrated , 2014 .

[8]  Q. Zhou,et al.  Model reduction and optimal parameters of mid-story isolation systems , 2016 .

[9]  Salvatore Perno,et al.  Dynamic response and optimal design of structures with large mass ratio TMD , 2012 .

[10]  Yaohua Zhang,et al.  Asynchronous driving principle and its application to vibration control , 2000 .

[11]  Liang Fang,et al.  An experimental study on seismic responses of multifunctional vibration-absorption reinforced concrete megaframe structures , 2004 .

[12]  Wei Cui,et al.  Seismic response of segmental buildings , 1995 .

[13]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Response spectrum method for multi‐support seismic excitations , 1992 .

[14]  Chunlin Wang,et al.  Dynamic Responses of Core-Tubes with Semi-Flexible Suspension Systems Linked by Viscoelastic Dampers under Earthquake Excitation , 2011 .

[15]  Akira Wada,et al.  Development of the core‐suspended isolation system , 2011 .

[16]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas , 2008 .

[17]  Hussam Mahmoud,et al.  Response of building systems with suspended floor slabs under dynamic excitations , 2015 .

[18]  Dong Wang,et al.  Controlling characteristics of passive mega-subcontrolled frame subjected to random wind loads , 2005 .

[19]  Ali Bozer,et al.  Finding optimal parameters of tuned mass dampers , 2015 .

[20]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Vibration Control of Tall Buildings Using Mega Subconfiguration , 1995 .

[21]  Kuo-Chun Chang,et al.  Dynamic behavior of a building structure tested with base and mid-story isolation systems , 2012 .

[22]  F. Cheng,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Design with Pareto Genetic Algorithm , 1997 .

[23]  Anna Reggio,et al.  Optimal energy‐based seismic design of non‐conventional Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) implemented via inter‐story isolation , 2015 .