Nutritional state and collective motion: from individuals to mass migration

In order to move effectively in unpredictable or heterogeneous environments animals must make appropriate decisions in response to internal and external cues. Identifying the link between these components remains a challenge for movement ecology and is important in understanding the mechanisms driving both individual and collective motion. One accessible way of examining how internal state influences an individual's motion is to consider the nutritional state of an animal. Our experimental results reveal that nutritional state exerts a relatively minor influence on the motion of isolated individuals, but large group-level differences emerge from diet affecting inter-individual interactions. This supports the idea that mass movement in locusts may be driven by cannibalism. To estimate how these findings are likely to impact collective migration of locust hopper bands, we create an experimentally parametrized model of locust interactions and motion. Our model supports our hypothesis that nutrient-dependent social interactions can lead to the collective motion seen in our experiments and predicts a transition in the mean speed and the degree of coordination of bands with increasing insect density. Furthermore, increasing the interaction strength (representing greater protein deprivation) dramatically reduces the critical density at which this transition occurs, demonstrating that individuals' nutritional state could have a major impact on large-scale migration.

[1]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[2]  D. Kramer,et al.  The Behavioral Ecology of Intermittent Locomotion1 , 2001 .

[3]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  Nutritional state and collective motion: from individuals to mass migration , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  A. Selverston,et al.  Dynamical principles in neuroscience , 2006 .

[5]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[6]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective behavior in cancer cell populations , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[7]  H. Chaté,et al.  Onset of collective and cohesive motion. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[8]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses , 1996, Nature.

[10]  J. Sethna Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, and Complexity , 2021 .

[11]  Shang‐keng Ma Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena , 1976 .

[12]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Ran Nathan,et al.  An emerging movement ecology paradigm , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Stephen J. Simpson,et al.  Analysis of phase-related changes in behaviour of desert locust nymphs , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  F. Bartumeus Behavioral intermittence, Lévy patterns, and randomness in animal movement , 2009 .

[16]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  Collective Motion and Cannibalism in Locust Migratory Bands , 2008, Current Biology.

[17]  D. Sumpter The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[19]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  A framework for generating and analyzing movement paths on ecological landscapes , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Spontaneously ordered motion of self-propelled particles , 1997, cond-mat/0611741.

[21]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[22]  Christophe Becco,et al.  Experimental evidences of a structural and dynamical transition in fish school , 2006 .

[23]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  Fractal reorientation clocks: Linking animal behavior to statistical patterns of search , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  I. Couzin,et al.  Cannibal crickets on a forced march for protein and salt. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  I. Couzin Collective minds , 2007, Nature.

[26]  I. Couzin Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  M. Burrows The Neurobiology of an Insect Brain , 1996 .

[28]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  Collective motion due to individual escape and pursuit response. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[29]  David Raubenheimer,et al.  The Hungry Locust , 2000 .

[30]  Pauline E. Millican,et al.  In the Laboratory , 2007 .

[31]  Calder,et al.  Nutritional homeostasis in locusts: is there a mechanism for increased energy expenditure during carbohydrate overfeeding? , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  P. Ellis,et al.  The Marching Behaviour of Hoppers of the African Migratory Locust (Locusta migratoria migratorioides R. & F.) in the Laboratory. , 1951 .

[33]  S. Simpson,et al.  Haemolymph amino acid and sugar levels in locusts fed nutritionally unbalanced diets , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[34]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[35]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions , 2004, Nature.

[36]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[37]  Ch. Beccoa,et al.  Experimental evidences of a structural and dynamical transition in fish school , 2006 .