Outcome of repeat trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in isolation or combined with phacoemulsification.

Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of repeat trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C (MMC) in isolation or combined with phacoemulsification, and to identify risk factors for failure over 1 year. Methods Retrospective review of 113 eyes of 113 patients (49 primary open angle, 27 primary angle closure, 37 secondary glaucoma) who underwent repeat trabeculectomy with MMC (isolated trabeculectomy 75 and phacotrabeculectomy 38). The primary outcome measure was intraocular pressure (IOP) at 1 year follow-up. Three IOP criteria were chosen to measure success A) IOP ≤21 mmHg and ≥20% reduction from baseline. B) IOP ≤17 mmHg and ≥20% reduction from baseline. C) IOP ≤14 mmHg. Results Mean IOP decreased from 24.5 ± 8.8 mmHg to 16.4 ± 7.6 mmHg 1 year after repeat trabeculectomy. The mean number of medications reduced from 2.9 ± 1.0 to 0.6 ± 1.0. Complete success with trabeculectomy versus phacotrabeculectomy for criterion A was 60% vs 55.3%, criterion B 54.7% vs 50.0% and criterion C 40.0% vs 28.9%. IOP ≤14 mmHg was more likely with trabeculectomy than phacotrabeculectomy (P = 0.047). On regression analysis, duration between surgeries ≤4 years (P = 0.018) and secondary glaucoma (P = 0.046) were identified as risk factors for surgical failure with criterion A. Younger age (P = 0.042), fornix based flap (P = 0.058), and phacotrabeculectomy (P = 0.042) for criterion C. Conclusion Repeat trabeculectomy with MMC is successful at lowering IOP and decreasing number of antiglaucoma medications. Low IOP levels are less likely with phacotrabeculectomy.

[1]  A. Rotchford,et al.  Outcome of repeat trabeculectomies: long-term follow-up , 2017, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[2]  S. Philipp,et al.  Two-Year Outcome of Repeat Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C in Primary Open-Angle and PEX Glaucoma , 2015, European journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  W. Feuer,et al.  Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  W. Feuer,et al.  The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice , 2012, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[5]  U. Elgin,et al.  Comparison of the Outcome of Repeat Trabeculectomy with Adjunctive Mitomycin C and Initial Trabeculectomy , 2011, Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO.

[6]  A. Rotchford,et al.  Outcome of repeat trabeculectomies , 2011, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[7]  A. Coleman,et al.  Long-term outcomes of repeat vs initial trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  W. Feuer,et al.  Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy study after one year of follow-up. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  E. Schechtman,et al.  Comparison of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C with or without phacoemulsification and lens implantation. , 2002, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.

[10]  R. Derick,et al.  Combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy alone: a comparison study using mitomycin-C. , 1998, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.

[11]  R. Hitchings,et al.  Local effects of previous conjunctival incisional surgery and the subsequent outcome of filtration surgery. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.