Quiescent H-mode plasmas in the DIII-D tokamak

H-mode operation is the choice for next-step tokamak devices based either on conventional or advanced tokamak physics. This choice, however, comes at a significant cost for both the conventional and advanced tokamaks because of the effects of edge-localized modes (ELMs). ELMs can produce significant erosion in the divertor and can affect the β limit and reduced core transport regions needed for advanced tokamak operation. Recent experimental results from DIII-D have demonstrated a new operating regime, the quiescent H-mode regime, which solves these problems. We have achieved quiescent H-mode operation which is ELM-free and yet has good density control. In addition, we have demonstrated that an internal transport barrier can be produced and maintained inside the H-mode edge barrier for long periods of time (>3.5 s or >25 energy confinement times τE). By forming the core barrier and then stepping up the input power, we have achieved βNH89 = 7 for up to 10 times the τE of 160 ms. The βNH89 values of 7 substantially exceed the value of 4 routinely achieved in standard ELMing \mbox{H-mode.} The key factors in creating the quiescent H-mode operation are neutral beam injection in the direction opposite to the plasma current (counter injection) plus cryopumping to reduce the density. Density control in the quiescent H-mode is possible because of the presence of an edge MHD oscillation, the edge harmonic oscillation, which enhances the edge particle transport while leaving the energy transport unaffected.

[1]  J. Kinsey,et al.  The quiescent double barrier regime in the DIII-D tokamak , 2001 .

[2]  J. Kinsey,et al.  The quiescent double barrier regime in DIII-D , 2001 .

[3]  L. Lao,et al.  Quiescent double barrier high-confinement mode plasmas in the DIII-D tokamak , 2001 .

[4]  K. Burrell Diagnostics for advanced tokamak research (invited) , 2001 .

[5]  R. D. Deranian,et al.  Progress in quantifying the edge physics of the H mode regime in DIII-D , 2000 .

[6]  J. Snipes,et al.  Pedestal profiles and fluctuations in C-Mod enhanced D-alpha H-modes , 2000 .

[7]  T. L. Rhodes,et al.  Observation of simultaneous internal transport barriers in all four transport channels and correlation with turbulence behaviour in NCS discharges on DIII-D , 2000 .

[8]  A. Hubbard,et al.  Studies of EDA H-Mode in Alcator C-Mod , 2000 .

[9]  L. Lao,et al.  Modification of high mode pedestal instabilities in the DIII-D tokamak , 2000 .

[10]  D. J. Campbell,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 1999 .

[11]  P. T. Bonoli,et al.  Characterization of enhanced Dα high-confinement modes in Alcator C-Mod , 1999 .

[12]  W. Kerner,et al.  Plasma confinement in JET H?mode plasmas with H, D, DT and T isotopes , 1999 .

[13]  K. Tritz,et al.  The beam emission spectroscopy diagnostic on the DIII-D tokamak , 1999 .

[14]  D. Brower,et al.  Integrated reflectometer-interferometer system for plasma density profile measurement , 1998 .

[15]  A. Loarte,et al.  The impact of ELMs on the ITER divertor , 1998 .

[16]  E. Doyle,et al.  Signal amplitude effects on reflectometer studies of density turbulence in tokamaks , 1998 .

[17]  T. S. Taylor,et al.  Physics of advanced tokamaks , 1997 .

[18]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Optimized profiles for improved confinement and stability in the DIII-D tokamak , 1994 .

[19]  R. L. Miller,et al.  Stabilization of ballooning modes with sheared toroidal rotation , 1994 .

[20]  S. Coda,et al.  A phase contrast interferometer on DIII‐D , 1992 .

[21]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Very high confinement discharges in DIII‐D after boronization , 1992 .

[22]  R. Philipona,et al.  Development and operation of a backward wave oscillator based FIR scattering system for DIII-D , 1990 .

[23]  D. N. Hill,et al.  Langmuir probe array for the DIII-D divertor , 1990 .