Using Computers to Individually-generate vs. Collaboratively-generate Concept Maps

Five eighth grade science classes of students in at a middle school were assigned to three treatment groups: those who individually concept mapped, those who collaboratively concept mapped, and those who independently used their study time. The findings revealed that individually generating concept maps on computers during study time positively influenced science concept learning above and beyond independent use of study time, but that collaboratively generating concept maps did not. Students in both individual and collaborative concept mapping groups had positive attitudes toward concept mapping using Inspiration software. However, students in the collaborative concept mapping group did not like working in a group. This study contributes to the limited body of knowledge concerning the comparative effectiveness of individually and collaboratively-generating concept maps on computers for learning.

[1]  David Hyerle.  A Field Guide to Using Visual Tools , 2000 .

[2]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking , 1999 .

[3]  D. Jonassen.  Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model , 1994 .

[4]  B. Daley.  Facilitating Learning with Adult Students Through Concept Mapping , 2002 .

[5]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Problems and Issues in the Use of Concept Maps in Science Assessment. , 1996 .

[6]  R. Mayer.  Systematic Thinking Fostered by Illustrations in Scientific Text , 1989 .

[7]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools , 1998 .

[8]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Concept maps as hypermedia components , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  Lauren Cifuentes,et al.  Visualization for Middle School Students’ Engagement in Science Learning , 2004 .

[10]  John R. Staver,et al.  Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis , 1995 .

[11]  Wolff‐Michael Roth.  Student Views of Collaborative Concept Mapping: An Emancipatory Research Project. , 1994 .

[12]  Lynne Anderson-Inman,et al.  Computer-Based Concept Mapping: Active Studying for Active Learners. , 1993 .

[13]  F. Fischer,et al.  Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools , 2002 .

[14]  E. Plotnick.  Concept Mapping: A Graphical System for Understanding the Relationship between Concepts. ERIC Digest. , 1997 .

[15]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[16]  L. Cifuentes,et al.  A cross-cultural study of the effect of student-generated visualization on middle school students’ science concept learning in Texas and Taiwan , 2003 .

[17]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[18]  O. Jegede,et al.  The effect of concept mapping on students' anxiety and achievement in biology , 1990 .

[19]  K. Fisher.  Semantic Networking: The New Kid on the Block , 1990 .

[20]  Norman Wiseman,et al.  An Introductory Guide to Scientific Visualization , 1992, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[21]  J. Clement,et al.  Effects of Student-Generated Diagrams versus Student-Generated Summaries on Conceptual Understanding of Causal and Dynamic Knowledge in Plate Tectonics. , 1999 .

[22]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[23]  Lauren Cifuentes,et al.  Student-Generated Visualization as a Study Strategy for Science Concept Learning , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[24]  B. Gains,et al.  An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool , 1995 .

[25]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes , 1995 .

[26]  P Eric,et al.  Concept Mapping: a Graphical System for Understanding the Relationship Between Concepts , 1997 .

[27]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[28]  Regina Royer,et al.  Comparing Hand Drawn and Computer Generated Concept Mapping , 2004 .

[29]  Chun-Chieh Huang,et al.  Collaborative Concept Mapping Processes Mediated by Computer , 2000 .

[30]  Diana C. Rice,et al.  Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in the Science Classroom: Must Different Methods Compete?. , 1998 .

[31]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking , 1998 .

[32]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[33]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Collaborative learning and computer‐supported groups , 1999 .

[34]  Lauren Cifuentes,et al.  Visualization for Construction of Meaning during Study Time. , 2001 .

[35]  David S. Brown.  High School Biology: A Group Approach to Concept Mapping , 2003 .