Toward Computing with Spider Webs: Computational Setup Realization

Spiders are able to extract crucial information, such as the location prey, predators, mates, and even broken threads from propagating web vibrations. The complex structure of the web suggests that the morphology itself might provide computational support in form of a mechanical signal processing system - often referred to as morphological computation. We present preliminary results on identifying these computational aspects in naturally spun webs. A recently presented definition for physical computational systems, consisting of three main elements: (i) a mathematical part, (ii) a computational setup with a theoretical and real part, and (iii) an interpretation, is employed for the first time, to characterize these morphological computation properties. Signal transmission properties of a real spider orb web, as the real part of a morphological computation setup, is investigated in response to step transverse inputs. The parameters of a lumped system model, as the theoretical part of a morphological computation setup, are identified empirically and with the help of an earlier FEM model for the same web. As the possible elements of a computational framework, the web transverse signal filtering, attenuation, delay, memory effect, and deformation modes are briefly discussed based on experimental data and numerical simulations.

[1]  Ramón Zaera,et al.  The secondary frame in spider orb webs: the detail that makes the difference , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  N. Pugno,et al.  Spider web-structured labyrinthine acoustic metamaterials for low-frequency sound control , 2017, 1701.07622.

[3]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  How the body shapes the way we think - a new view on intelligence , 2006 .

[4]  Keyan Zahedi,et al.  Morphological Computation: Synergy of Body and Brain , 2017, Entropy.

[5]  F Vollrath,et al.  Remote monitoring of vibrational information in spider webs , 2018, The Science of Nature.

[6]  F. Vollrath,et al.  The Role of Behavior in the Evolution of Spiders, Silks, and Webs , 2007 .

[7]  H. Markl,et al.  Vibration signal transmission in spider orb webs. , 1981, Science.

[8]  W. Mitch Masters,et al.  Vibrations in the orbwebs of Nuctenea sclopetaria (Araneidae) , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  S. M. Hadi Sadati,et al.  Three-Dimensional-Printable Thermoactive Helical Interface With Decentralized Morphological Stiffness Control for Continuum Manipulators , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[10]  Tao Li,et al.  Information processing via physical soft body , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Ko Okumura,et al.  Simple model for the mechanics of spider webs. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[12]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  Morphological Computation and Morphological Control: Steps Toward a Formal Theory and Applications , 2013, Artificial Life.

[13]  F Vollrath,et al.  Tuning the instrument: sonic properties in the spider's web , 2016, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  M. Naraghi,et al.  An Automatic Algorithm to Derive Linear Vector Form of Lagrangian Equation of Motion with Collision and Constraint , 2015 .

[15]  W. M. Masters,et al.  Vibrations in the orbwebs of Nuctenea sclopetaria (Araneidae) , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  D. Porter,et al.  Two mechanisms for supercontraction in Nephila spider dragline silk. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[17]  L. Serpell,et al.  Spider silk and amyloid fibrils: a structural comparison. , 2007, Macromolecular bioscience.

[18]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  Exploiting short-term memory in soft body dynamics as a computational resource , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  Marco Giunti,et al.  What is a Physical Realization of a Computational System , 2017 .

[20]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  The role of feedback in morphological computation with compliant bodies , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Matthew Howard,et al.  Internal impedance control helps information gain in embodied perception , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[22]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Opinions and Outlooks on Morphological Computation , 2014 .

[23]  Keyan Zahedi,et al.  Evaluating Morphological Computation in Muscle and DC-Motor Driven Models of Hopping Movements , 2016, Front. Robot. AI.

[24]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  Spine dynamics as a computational resource in spine-driven quadruped locomotion , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[25]  F. Barth,et al.  Spider vibration receptors: Threshold curves of individual slits in the metatarsal lyriform organ , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[26]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.