Optimizing Auditory Brainstem Response Acquisition Using Interleaved Frequencies

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) require averaging responses to hundreds or thousands of repetitions of a stimulus (e.g., tone pip) to obtain a measurable evoked response at the scalp. Fast repetition rates lead to changes in ABR amplitude and latency due to adaptation. To minimize the effect of adaptation, stimulus rates are sometimes as low as 10 to 13.3/s, requiring long acquisition times. The trade-off between reducing acquisition time and minimizing the effect of adaptation on ABR responses is an especially important consideration for studies of cochlear synaptopathy which use the amplitude of short latency responses (wave 1) to assess auditory nerve survival. It has been proposed that adaptation during ABR acquisition can be reduced by interleaving tones at different frequencies, rather than testing each frequency serially. With careful ordering of frequencies and levels in the stimulus train, adaptation in the auditory nerve can be minimized, thereby permitting an increase in the rate at which tone bursts are presented. However, widespread adoption of this paradigm has been hindered by lack of available software. Here, we develop and validate an interleaved stimulus paradigm to optimize the rate of ABR measurement while minimizing adaptation. We implement this method in an open-source data acquisition software tool, which permits either serial or interleaved ABR measurements. The software library, psiexperiment, is compatible with widely-used ABR hardware. Consistent with previous studies, careful design of an interleaved stimulus train can reduce ABR acquisition time by more than half, with minimal effect on ABR thresholds and wave 1 latency, while improving measures of wave 1 amplitude.

[1]  N. Kiang,et al.  Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat III: identified cell populations , 1996, Hearing Research.

[2]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  The No-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[3]  J. Mills,et al.  Anesthesia effects: auditory brain-stem response. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Burkard,et al.  Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). III: Additivity of click level and rate with noise level. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Alexander Joseph Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[6]  E. Rubel,et al.  Deafness and retinal degeneration in a novel USH1C knock‐in mouse model , 2010, Developmental neurobiology.

[7]  U Eysholdt,et al.  Maximum length sequences -- a fast method for measuring brain-stem-evoked responses. , 1982, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[8]  ABR obtained from time-efficient train stimuli for cisplatin ototoxicity monitoring. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[9]  J. Capitanio,et al.  Risk factors for stereotypic behavior and self‐biting in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): Animal's history, current environment, and personality , 2013, American journal of primatology.

[10]  T. Brozoski,et al.  A comparison of the effects of isoflurane and ketamine anesthesia on auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds in rats , 2012, Hearing Research.

[11]  M. Liberman,et al.  Primary Neural Degeneration in the Guinea Pig Cochlea After Reversible Noise-Induced Threshold Shift , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[12]  L. W. Norrix,et al.  Clinicians' Guide to Obtaining a Valid Auditory Brainstem Response to Determine Hearing Status: Signal, Noise, and Cross-Checks. , 2018, American journal of audiology.

[13]  Manuel Sainz,et al.  Recording of auditory brainstem response at high stimulation rates using randomized stimulation and averaging. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[15]  Walt Kester,et al.  The data conversion handbook , 2005 .

[16]  Lin Sun,et al.  Chronic ketamine exposure induces permanent impairment of brain functions in adolescent cynomolgus monkeys , 2014, Addiction biology.

[17]  Kcstcr The Data Conversion Handbook , 2007 .

[18]  J. Henry,et al.  Use of auditory brainstem responses for the early detection of ototoxicity from aminoglycosides or chemotherapeutic drugs. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  Regina Nuzzo,et al.  Scientific method: Statistical errors , 2014, Nature.

[20]  S. Griest,et al.  Auditory Brainstem Response Altered in Humans With Noise Exposure Despite Normal Outer Hair Cell Function , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[21]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment , 2016, bioRxiv.

[22]  E. Gundelfinger,et al.  Onset Coding Is Degraded in Auditory Nerve Fibers from Mutant Mice Lacking Synaptic Ribbons , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Liberman,et al.  Acceleration of Age-Related Hearing Loss by Early Noise Exposure: Evidence of a Misspent Youth , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  P. Dallos,et al.  Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Liberman,et al.  Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Liberman,et al.  Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  G. McMillan,et al.  Bayesian Applications in Auditory Research. , 2019, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[28]  R. Maddox,et al.  The Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response , 2019, bioRxiv.

[29]  J. Kruschke Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  John Salvatier,et al.  Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3 , 2016, PeerJ Comput. Sci..

[31]  R. Burkard Human brain-stem auditory evoked responses obtained by cross correlation to trains of clicks, noise bursts, and tone bursts. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  N. Kiang,et al.  Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. I. An experimental approach to their identification , 1996, Hearing Research.

[33]  I. Fujimori,et al.  A multibit delta-sigma audio DAC with 120-dB dynamic range , 2000, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[34]  G. Housley,et al.  Differential actions of isoflurane and ketamine-based anaesthetics on cochlear function in the mouse , 2012, Hearing Research.

[35]  The Use of a 56-Stimulus Train for the Rapid Acquisition of Auditory Brainstem Responses , 1999, Audiology and Neurotology.

[36]  J.H. Hwang,et al.  Effects of Sex, Age and Hearing Asymmetry on the Interaural Differences of Auditory Brainstem Responses , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[37]  Rapid acquisition of auditory brainstem responses with multiple frequency and intensity tone-bursts , 1996, Hearing Research.

[38]  Tiffany A. Johnson,et al.  Auditory Function in Normal-Hearing, Noise-Exposed Human Ears , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[39]  D. Noffsinger,et al.  Effects of stimulus repetition rate and frequency on the auditory brainstem response in normal cochlear-impaired, and VIII nerve/brainstem-impaired subjects. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[40]  Action potentials in the cochlea. Masking, adaptation and recruitment. , 1971, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[41]  K E Hecox,et al.  A comparison of maximum length and Legendre sequences for the derivation of brain-stem auditory-evoked responses at rapid rates of stimulation. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  I. Whitfield Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve , 1966 .

[43]  S. Harner,et al.  Auditory Brain Stem Response Results from 255 Patients with Suspected Retrocochlear Involvement , 1982, Ear and hearing.

[44]  Acquisition and Analysis of High Rate Deconvolved Auditory Evoked Potentials during Sleep , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.