Rejecting small gambles under expected utility

This paper contributes to an important recent debate around expected utility and risk aversion. Rejecting a gamble over a given range of wealth levels imposes a lower bound on risk aversion. Using this lower bound and empirical evidence on the range of the risk aversion coefficient, we calibrate the relationship between risk attitudes over small-stakes and large-stakes gambles. We find that rejecting small gambles is consistent with expected utility, contrary to a recent literature that concludes that expected utility is fundamentally unfit to explain decisions under uncertainty. Paradoxical behavior is only obtained when calibrations are made in a region of the parameter space that is not empirically relevant.

[1]  N. Kocherlakota,et al.  The Equity Premium: It’s Still a Puzzle , 1999 .

[2]  H. P. Binswanger Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural india , 1980 .

[3]  K. Arrow Essays in the theory of risk-bearing , 1958 .

[4]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Do Workers Work More if Wages are High? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment , 2007 .

[5]  Miles S. Kimball,et al.  Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Survey , 1995 .

[6]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[7]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[8]  Richard Watt Defending Expected Utility Theory: Comment , 2002 .

[9]  T. Palfrey,et al.  Risk Averse Behavior in Asymmetric Matching Pennies Games , 2000 .

[10]  M. Machina "Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom , 1982 .

[11]  Kfir Eliaz,et al.  Comments on the Risk and Time Preferences in Economics , 2002 .

[12]  C. Whitehead,et al.  Effectiveness of dietary 25- and 1-hydroxycholecalciferol in combating tibial dyschondroplasia in broiler chickens. , 1996, British poultry science.

[13]  R. Thaler,et al.  Anomalies: Risk Aversion , 2001 .

[14]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Increasing risk: I. A definition , 1970 .

[15]  Ignacio Palacios-Huerta,et al.  Rejecting Small Gambles under Expected Utility: a Comment on Rabin , 2001 .

[16]  Ilya Segal,et al.  Solutions manual for Microeconomic theory : Mas-Colell, Whinston and Green , 1997 .

[17]  P. Samuelson Risk and uncertainty: a fallacy of large numbers , 1963 .

[18]  Uzi Segal,et al.  Observing different orders of risk aversion , 1994 .

[19]  David W Harless,et al.  The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories , 1994 .

[20]  J. Henrich,et al.  Are Peasants Risk‐Averse Decision Makers?1 , 2002, Current Anthropology.

[21]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Credit Market Constraints, Consumption Smoothing, and the Accumulation of Durable Production Assets in Low-Income Countries: Investments in Bullocks in India , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  W. Rambeck,et al.  Synergistic effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 and 24,25(OH)2D3 on duodenal CaBP in rachitic chicks and on eggshell weight in Japanese quails. , 1985, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[23]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability , 1994 .

[24]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[25]  Eugenio J. Miravete Choosing the Wrong Calling Plan? Ignorance, Learning, and Risk Aversion , 2000 .

[26]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  Quantal Response Equilibrium and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[27]  J. Laffont Advances in Economic Theory , 1995 .

[28]  R. Mehra,et al.  THE EQUITY PREMIUM A Puzzle , 1985 .

[29]  R. Stambaugh,et al.  Asset Returns and Intertemporal Preferences , 1991 .

[30]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[31]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[32]  L. Milanesi,et al.  Vitamin D compounds in plants , 2003 .

[33]  Colin Camerer Individual Decision Making , 2020, The Handbook of Experimental Economics.

[34]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[35]  M. Yaari The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk , 1987 .

[36]  Erzo G. J. Luttmer Asset pricing in economies with frictions , 1996 .

[37]  J. Hey,et al.  INVESTIGATING GENERALIZATIONS OF EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY USING EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994, Experiments in Economics.

[38]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  Estimation Of State-Dependent Utility Functions Using Survey Data , 1991 .

[39]  Uzi Segal,et al.  First order versus second order risk aversion , 1990 .

[40]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  A Microeconometric Analysis of Risk Aversion and the Decision to Self-Insure , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[41]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[42]  Larry G. Epstein Advances in Economic Theory: Behavior under risk: recent developments in theory and applications , 1993 .

[43]  Chris D. Orme,et al.  Investigating Generalisations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data , 1994 .

[44]  Andrew Metrick,et al.  A Natural Experiment in "Jeopardy!" , 1995 .

[45]  Matthew Rabin,et al.  Diminishing Marginal Utility of Wealth Cannot Explain Risk Aversion , 2000 .

[46]  M. Rabin Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem , 2000 .

[47]  James C. Cox,et al.  Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory : Coherence for Small-and Large-Stakes Gambles , 2001 .