Influence of structural geometry on the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis.

Doppler-derived gradients may overestimate total pressure loss in degenerative and prosthetic aortic valve stenosis (AS) due to unaccounted pressure recovery distal to the orifice. However, in congenitally bicuspid valves, jet eccentricity may result in a higher anatomic-to-effective orifice contraction ratio, resulting in an increased pressure loss at the valve and a reduced pressure recovery distal to the orifice leading to greater functional severity. The objective of our study was to determine the impact of local geometry on the total versus Doppler-derived pressure loss and therefore the assessed severity of the stenosis in bicuspid valves. On the basis of clinically obtained measurements, two- and three-dimensional computer simulations were created with various local geometries by altering the diameters of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT; 1.8-3.0 cm), orifice diameter (OD; 0.8-1.6 cm), and aortic root diameter (AR; 3.0-5.4 cm). Jet eccentricity was altered in the models from 0 to 25 degrees. Simulations were performed under steady-flow conditions. Axisymmetric simulations indicate that the overall differences in pressure recovery were minor for variations in LVOT diameter (<3%). However, both OD and AR had a significant impact on pressure recovery (6-20%), with greatest recovery being the larger OD and the smaller recovery being the AR. In addition, three-dimensional data illustrate a greater pressure loss for eccentric jets with the same orifice area, thus increasing functional severity. In conclusion, jet eccentricity results in greater pressure loss in bicuspid valve AS due to reduced effective orifice area. Functional severity may also be enhanced by larger aortic roots, commonly occurring in these patients, leading to reduced pressure recovery. Thus, for the same anatomic orifice area, functional severity is greater in bicuspid than in degenerative tricuspid AS.

[1]  B. Carabello,et al.  Valvular heart disease. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  G Maurer,et al.  Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. , 1990, Circulation.

[3]  J. Chambers Is pressure recovery an important cause of "Doppler aortic stenosis" with no gradient at cardiac catheterisation? , 1996, Heart.

[4]  K. Karsch,et al.  Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis. , 1999, European heart journal.

[5]  L L Huntsman,et al.  Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) , 1998 .

[7]  C. Ward Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve , 2000, Heart.

[8]  G. Thiene,et al.  Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves , 1999, Heart.

[9]  P. Vandervoort,et al.  Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position. , 1995, Circulation.

[10]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation in vitro: a manifestation of pressure recovery. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  G Maurer,et al.  "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. , 1996, Circulation.

[13]  C. DeGroff Jet eccentricity: a misleading source of agreement between Doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[14]  O. Bech-Hanssen,et al.  Important pressure recovery in patients with aortic stenosis and high Doppler gradients. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  W. Laskey,et al.  Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis. , 1994, Circulation.