Identification and Multi-Objective Controller Tuning of a Plastic Injection Molding Machine

In this paper, a multi-objective approach to controller tuning is described. An algorithm for implementation of this tuning is given. This approach has the following merits: there is no restriction on the type or number of performance criteria; no a 'priori weights need be chosen since performance criteria are not combined into a single objective function. The intention is that the algorithm is implemented to run in real-time so as to provide immediate feedback to a process operator about the current operating point. If the current operating point is not Pareto optimal, the algorithm can automatically adjust the parameters to achieve this. If it is Pareto optimal but not desirable, the algorithm can provide information on how trade-offs can be made so that the desired operating point is achieved. The algorithm is applied to the tuning of a PID controller for the plastication phase of an injection molding process. An analytic model for this process is presented. Experiments are described in which data was collected from this process, and an empirical discrete-time transfer function was identified. This transfer function was then used, within a simulation, to allow the algorithm to tune the controller, with respect to two objective functions. The tradeoff curve for these objectives, and corresponding controller gains is presented.

[1]  R. K. Bayer,et al.  Properties of elongational flow injection‐molded polyethylene part 2: Influence of processing parameters , 1989 .

[2]  Daniel P. Giesy,et al.  Multicriteria Optimization Methods for Design of Aircraft Control Systems , 1988 .

[3]  G. Derringer,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables , 1980 .

[4]  R. K. Bayer,et al.  Properties of elongational flow injection-molded polyethylene. Part 1: Influence of mold geometry , 1989 .

[5]  Joseph J. Talavage,et al.  A Tradeoff Cut Approach to Multiple Objective Optimization , 1980, Oper. Res..

[6]  D. Hull,et al.  The effect of orientation on the mechanical properties of injection molded polystyrene , 1977 .

[7]  S. Zionts,et al.  An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem , 1976 .

[8]  R. Benayoun,et al.  Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (stem) , 1971, Math. Program..

[9]  Christopher Michael Seaman,et al.  A multiple objective optimization approach to quality control , 1991 .

[10]  Bernard Sanschagrin,et al.  Process control of injection molding , 1983 .

[11]  Richard A. Freund,et al.  Definitions and Basic Quality Concepts , 1985 .

[12]  Arthur M. Geoffrion,et al.  An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department , 1972 .

[13]  Derek J. Pike,et al.  Empirical Model‐building and Response Surfaces. , 1988 .

[14]  Musa R. Kamal,et al.  Current Trends in the Analysis of Polymer Shaping Operations , 1984 .

[15]  D. Graham,et al.  The synthesis of "optimum" transient response: Criteria and standard forms , 1953, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Part II: Applications and Industry.

[16]  Karl-Erik Årzén Realization of Expert System Based Feedback Control , 1987 .

[17]  Marc Despontin,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application, Ralph E. Steuer (Ed.). Wiley, Palo Alto, CA (1986) , 1987 .

[18]  Olvi L. Mangasarian,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1969 .

[19]  Ralph E. Steuer Multiple criteria optimization , 1986 .