An experimental study of two grave excavation methods: Arbitrary Level Excavation and Stratigraphic Excavation

Abstract The process of archaeological excavation is one of destruction. It normally provides archaeologists with a singular opportunity to recognise, define, extract and record archaeological evidence: the artefacts, features and deposits present in the archaeological record. It is expected that when archaeologists are excavating in a research, commercial or forensic setting the methods that they utilise will ensure a high rate of evidence recognition and recovery. Methods need to be accepted amongst the archaeological and scientific community they are serving and be deemed reliable. For example, in forensic contexts, methods need to conform to scientific and legal criteria so that the evidence retrieved is admissible in a court of law. Two standard methods of grave excavation were examined in this study with the aim of identifying the better approach in terms of evidence recovery. Four archaeologists with a range of experience each excavated two similarly constructed experimental ‘single graves’ using two different excavation methods. Those tested were the arbitrary level excavation method and the stratigraphic excavation method. The results from the excavations were used to compare recovery rates for varying forms of evidence placed within the graves. The stratigraphic excavation method resulted in higher rates of recovery for all evidence types, with an average of 71% of evidence being recovered, whereas the arbitrary level excavation method recovered an average of 56%. Neither method recovered all of the evidence. These findings raise questions about the reliability and so suitability of these established approaches to excavation.

[1]  Adrian Praetzellis,et al.  The limits of arbitrary excavation , 1993 .

[2]  Hugh Tuller,et al.  Keeping the pieces together: comparison of mass grave excavation methodology. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[3]  Edward C. Harris,et al.  Techniques of archaeological excavation , 1989 .

[4]  J. Nicolay.  Field archaeology from around the world , 2014 .

[5]  T. Thompson,et al.  Forensic Archaeology: Advances in Theory and Practice, Hunter, Cox. Routledge (2005), Paperback Price £24.99 Hardback Price £65.00 ISBN 0415273129 Paperback ISBN 0415273110 Hardback , 2006 .

[6]  D. Spennemann,et al.  Archaeological techniques for exhumations: a unique data source for crime scene investigations. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[7]  M. Joukowsky,et al.  A complete manual of field archaeology , 1980 .

[8]  Robert B. Pickering,et al.  The Use of Forensic Anthropology , 2009 .

[9]  Ian Hanson.  The importance of stratigraphy in forensic investigation , 2004, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[10]  H. G. Smith,et al.  Forensic archaeology. , 1976, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  John J. Schultz,et al.  Forensic Recovery of Human Remains: Archaeological Approaches , 2005 .

[12]  A. M. Pollard,et al.  Forensic archaeology in Britain , 1994, Antiquity.

[13]  Kevin Greene,et al.  Archaeology: An Introduction , 1983 .

[14]  Craig Spence,et al.  Archaeological Site Manual , 1994 .

[15]  H. Shafer,et al.  Excavation and Analysis of Human Remains , 2016 .

[16]  Edward C. Harris,et al.  The laws of archaeological stratigraphy , 1979 .

[17]  M. Carver.  Making Archaeology Happen: Design versus Dogma , 2016 .

[18]  Jane E. Buikstra,et al.  Forensic Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[19]  W. Haglund,et al.  The archaeology of contemporary mass graves , 2001, Historical archaeology.

[20]  Edward C. Harris,et al.  Principles of archaeological stratigraphy , 1979 .

[21]  Edward W. Killam.  The Detection of Human Remains , 1990 .

[22]  T. Crist.  Bad to the bone?: Historical archaeologists in the practice of forensic science , 2001 .

[23]  Lin Foxhall,et al.  The running sands of time: archaeology and the short-term , 2000 .

[24]  Karen Ramey Burns,et al.  Forensic Anthropology Training Manual , 2006 .

[25]  R. Janaway.  Degradation of clothing and other dress materials associated with buried bodies of both archaeological and forensic interest. , 2001 .

[26]  Douglas H. Ubelaker.  Review of: Forensic Methods: Excavation for the Archaeologist and Investigator , 2008 .

[27]  Grover Maurice Godwin.  Criminal Psychology and Forensic Technology : A Collaborative Approach to Effective Profiling , 2000 .

[28]  C. Roberts,et al.  The decay of buried human remains and their associated materials , 2013 .

[29]  I. Hanson,et al.  THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF MASS GRAVES , 2005 .

[30]  Michael J. Hochrein.  An Autopsy of the Grave: Recognizing, Collecting, and Preserving Forensic Geotaphonomic Evidence , 2001 .

[31]  Martin Carver,et al.  A Tropical Rainforest Site in Belize: Field Archaeology from Around the World: Ideas and Approaches , 2015 .

[32]  E. Harris.  Archaeology and the Ethics of Scientific Destruction , 2006 .

[33]  D. Congram,et al.  A Clandestine Burial in Costa Rica: Prospection and Excavation , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.