Bioremediation Study on Formation Damage Caused by Hydraulic Fracturing: A Microfluidic Approach

Hydraulic fracturing has been applied to unconventional reservoirs with low permeability to achieve higher productivity and economic potential. However, polyacrylamide-based friction reducer and guar gum, two of the most common components in fracturing fluid could cause formation damage by penetrating into the matrix and blocking the flow path. To regain the conductivity of the damaged area, a bioremediation method was developed and validated by a microfluidic approach. Modified nutrients were used to stimulate the indigenous bacteria that could consume or break the polymer residues. Indigenous bacteria were extracted from oil field produced water collected with customized anaerobic sampling kits which have been sterilized. Feasibility studies were conducted to investigate the indigenous bacteria activity with and without nutrient supply. Fracturing fluid, field water, and a modified nutrient recipe which contained 300 ppm of inorganic salts were loaded into anaerobic sample vials in a 140°F - 150°F incubator. Microfluidic tests were performed in 150°F oven with microfluidic chips designed and fabricated based on the topology of matrix networks. Fracturing fluids were injected into a chip saturated with field water to simulate formation damage. Remediation fluid consisting produced water, injection water and nutrient was injected into the chip. After two weeks soaking, 2% KCl brine was then injected into the chip at 200 nl/min until a stable pressure drop was achieved. Microscopic pictures were taken before and after soaking to demonstrate the polymer damage and the remediation of microfluidic chips. The indigenous bacteria were successfully stimulated with and without the existence of the friction reducer based on the results of feasibility tests. Microfluidic tests showed there is a significant difference in precipitations between the case with and without nutrient supply, which indicates that the bioremediation method could regain conductivity of the damaged formation. This work is novel research on bioremediation application in unconventional reservoirs with only indigenous bacteria involved. The customized sampling technology and laboratory approach could prevent contamination of other microbes and oxygen, which could improve the quality of the research. Microfluidic chip is a great simulation of porous media and a proof of concept between scientific hypothesis and field application which requires small sample size and provides good reproducibility. In field applications, only an extremely low amount of nutrient is required in this process which provide great economic potential. Additionally, the injected nutrients will be fully consumed by the bacteria which makes this technology is an Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) approach in energy industry.

[1]  A. Abedini,et al.  Past, Present, and Future of Microfluidic Fluid Analysis in the Energy Industry , 2022, Energy & Fuels.

[2]  A. Abedini,et al.  Effects of Thief Zones on Displacement Efficiency: Microfluidic Pore-Scale and Conformance Control Analysis , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  E. Boek,et al.  Developing innovative bio-nano catalysts well clean up fluid to remove formation damage by polymeric water-based drilling fluids , 2021, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[4]  S. Ahitan,et al.  A New Fluidics Method to Determine Minimum Miscibility Pressure , 2021, IOR 2021.

[5]  A. Abedini,et al.  Screening High-Temperature Foams with Microfluidics for Thermal Recovery Processes , 2021 .

[6]  A. Abdel-Fattah,et al.  High-temperature high-pressure microfluidic system for rapid screening of supercritical CO2 foaming agents , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[7]  H. Nasr-El-Din,et al.  Insights on Potential Formation Damage Mechanisms Associated with the Use of Gel Breakers in Hydraulic Fracturing , 2020, Polymers.

[8]  A. Abedini,et al.  Natural gas vaporization in a nanoscale throat connected model of shale: multi-scale, multi-component and multi-phase. , 2019, Lab on a chip.

[9]  Aymen Al-Ameri,et al.  Evaluation of the near fracture face formation damage caused by the spontaneously imbibed fracturing fluid in unconventional gas reservoirs , 2018, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[10]  A. Abedini,et al.  Nanomodel visualization of fluid injections in tight formations. , 2018, Nanoscale.

[11]  A. Abedini,et al.  Visualization of fracturing fluid dynamics in a nanofluidic chip , 2018, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[12]  Shibin Wang,et al.  Adsorption damage and control measures of slick-water fracturing fluid in shale reservoirs , 2018 .

[13]  D. Sinton,et al.  Direct Visualization of Evaporation in a Two-Dimensional Nanoporous Model for Unconventional Natural Gas , 2018 .

[14]  A. Abedini,et al.  Full Characterization of CO2-Oil Properties On-Chip: Solubility, Diffusivity, Extraction Pressure, Miscibility, and Contact Angle. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  A. Abedini,et al.  Asphaltene Deposition during Bitumen Extraction with Natural Gas Condensate and Naphtha , 2018 .

[16]  A. Abedini,et al.  Microfluidics-based measurement of solubility and diffusion coefficient of propane in bitumen , 2017 .

[17]  Z. You,et al.  Review on formation damage mechanisms and processes in shale gas reservoir: Known and to be known , 2016 .

[18]  Jodie L. Lutkenhaus,et al.  Effect of confinement on the bubble points of hydrocarbons in nanoporous media , 2016 .

[19]  J. Olson,et al.  Natural fractures in shale: A review and new observations , 2014 .

[20]  David Sinton,et al.  Energy: the microfluidic frontier. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[21]  Mary Kay Camarillo,et al.  Physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of compounds used in hydraulic fracturing. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  Farshid Mostowfi,et al.  Measurement of asphaltenes using optical spectroscopy on a microfluidic platform. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  Liangxing Li,et al.  Experimental Study on the Effective Particle Diameter of a Packed Bed with Non-Spherical Particles , 2011 .

[24]  Ernst Huenges,et al.  Hydraulic fracturing stimulation techniques and formation damage mechanisms—Implications from laboratory testing of tight sandstone-proppant systems , 2010 .

[25]  Emrah Özahi,et al.  A Modification on Ergun's Correlation for Use in Cylindrical Packed Beds With Non-spherical Particles , 2008 .

[26]  Michael W. Davidson,et al.  LASER SCANNING CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY , 2005 .

[27]  G. Penny,et al.  Microemulsion Additives Enable Optimized Formation Damage Repair and Prevention , 2005 .

[28]  G. Meunier,et al.  TURBISCAN MA 2000: multiple light scattering measurement for concentrated emulsion and suspension instability analysis. , 1999, Talanta.

[29]  H. Wadell,et al.  Volume, Shape, and Roundness of Quartz Particles , 1935, The Journal of Geology.