Virtual Communities of Practice – Experiences from VCoP

Online systems for sharing knowledge and for organizing communities of practice are increasing in numbers. In this paper, we claim that the system alone will not be sufficient regarding the knowledge sharing process, if fundamentals of creating and maintaining communities of practice are not attended to. This paper presents the experiences from two Norwegian organizations that have used an online system for sharing knowledge, for the purpose of building a community of practice within the organization. This is a pilot study of a larger project and the main focus has been on the role of the facilitator and on the key features of the facilitator role that supports the creation and maintenance of what is defined as Virtual Communities of Practice (VCoP). “Ordinary” Communities of Practice, as Lave and Wenger define it, are based on voluntary encounters between practitioners (Wenger, 1998a, Lave and Wenger, 1991). We investigate to what degree the Virtual Communities of Practice are voluntary, if at all. The research is mainly qualitative and data is collected through interviews. The respondents are users and administrators of the system. The system is called NoddlepodTM and is a Norwegian developed Knowledge Management System.

[1]  Alexandre Ardichvili,et al.  Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and Enablers , 2008 .

[2]  Joon Koh,et al.  Encouraging participation in virtual communities , 2007, CACM.

[3]  Ragnhild Kvålshaugen,et al.  Transnational practices in communities of task and communities of learning , 2014 .

[4]  S. Merriam.  Qualitative Case Studies , 2010 .

[5]  Line Dubé,et al.  ‘Structuring spontaneity’: investigating the impact of management practices on the success of virtual communities of practice , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[6]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[7]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Communities of practice and organizational performance , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[8]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[9]  Linda C. Li,et al.  Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[10]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Line Dubé,et al.  The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice , 2005 .

[12]  R. Yin.  The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy , 1981 .

[13]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[14]  Richard Mahee,et al.  Understanding Knowledge Sharing , 2007 .

[15]  Jens Gammelgaard,et al.  Knowledge retrieval through virtual communities of practice , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[17]  Sandra C. Jones,et al.  General practice training and virtual communities of practice - a review of the literature , 2012, BMC Family Practice.

[18]  R. Stake.  Qualitative Case Studies. , 2005 .

[19]  Enrique Murillo,et al.  Searching Usenet for virtual communities of practice: using mixed methods to identify the constructs of Wenger's theory , 2008, Inf. Res..

[20]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .