Intelligent participation: communicating knowledge in cross-functional project teams

This paper suggests 'intelligent participation' as a framework through which members of cross-functional project teams can engage productively in communicating knowledge. It identifies the transmission model of communication, and its accompanying discourse, as an implicit, but restrictive, conceptualisation underpinning much current research. It critiques that model as an oversimplification of energetic team exchanges into inert information transfer and proposes instead that communication be understood as a complex, living process. Understanding communicating knowledge as an ongoing series of interactions among participants, this paper fuses complex responsive process theory with the perspective of complex adaptive systems. It argues that focusing on local interactions within a systemic context enables a more realistic account of project interactions. This approach augments project management work on knowledge transfer with current communication theories, and also suggests specific capacities that may be developed to integrate cross-functional conversations that foster innovative, emergent outcomes.

[1]  A. Suchman,et al.  A new theoretical foundation for relationship-centered care , 2006, Journal of general internal medicine.

[2]  E. Eisenberg.  Flirting with Meaning , 1998 .

[3]  L. Lindkvist.  Knowledge Communities and Knowledge Collectivities: A Typology of Knowledge Work in Groups , 2005 .

[4]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Innovation in Project Management: Voices of Researchers , 2008 .

[5]  Linda S. Henderson.  The Impact of Project Managers’ Communication Competencies: Validation and Extension of a Research Model for Virtuality, Satisfaction, and Productivity on Project Teams , 2008 .

[6]  Rafael E. Landaeta,et al.  Evaluating Benefits and Challenges of Knowledge Transfer Across Projects , 2008 .

[7]  Mian M. Ajmal,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Project-Based Organizations: An Organizational Culture Perspective , 2008 .

[8]  Stephen Nicholas,et al.  Knowledge Creation in Groups: The Value of Cognitive Diversity, Transactive Memory, and Openmindedness Norms , 2005, ECKM.

[9]  G. Wilson,et al.  Boundary Objects as Rhetorical Exigence: Knowledge Mapping and Interdisciplinary Cooperation at the Los Alamos National Laboratory , 2007 .

[10]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  Accomplishing Knowledge , 2008 .

[11]  Daniel Andriessen,et al.  Stuff or love? How metaphors direct our efforts to manage knowledge in organisations , 2008 .

[12]  T. Cooke‐Davies,et al.  We're not in Kansas Anymore, Toto: Mapping the Strange Landscape of Complexity Theory, and Its Relationship to Project Management , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[13]  Verna Allee,et al.  12 Principles of Knowledge Management. , 1997 .

[14]  Harri Laihonen,et al.  A Complexity Theory Approach to Knowledge Management - Towards a Better Understanding of Communication and Knowledge Flows in Software Development , 2005, ECKM.

[15]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[16]  Roland Gareis,et al.  Global Project Management Handbook : Planning, Organizing and Controlling International Projects, Second Edition (Handbook) , 2006 .

[17]  Karen Ayas,et al.  Project-Based Learning: Building Communities of Reflective Practitioners , 2001 .

[18]  R. Stacey.  Learning as an activity of interdependent people , 2003 .

[19]  Cecilia Enberg,et al.  Exploring the Dynamics of Knowledge Integration , 2006 .

[20]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[21]  Zhu Zhichang.  Complexity science, systems thinking and pragmatic sensibility , 2007 .

[22]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects , 2008 .

[23]  Keith F. Snider,et al.  Beyond the Body of Knowledge: A Knowledge-Flow Approach to Project Management Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[24]  G. Hamel.  The Future of Management , 2007 .

[25]  Patrick S. W. Fong,et al.  Knowledge creation in multidisciplinary project teams: an empirical study of the processes and their dynamic interrelationships , 2003 .

[26]  Michael J. Reddy.  Metaphor and Thought: The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language , 1993 .

[27]  Kaj U. Koskinen.  Knowledge Management to Improve Project Communication and Implementation , 2004 .

[28]  Judith Lloyd Yero,et al.  Teaching in Mind: How Teacher Thinking Shapes Education , 2002 .

[29]  Robert Parent,et al.  A systems-based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[30]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Systems Intelligence: a Key Competence in Human Action and Organizational Life , 2007 .

[31]  M. Jakubik.  Exploring the knowledge landscape: four emerging views of knowledge , 2007 .

[32]  Jukka Luoma,et al.  Coping with complexity : Systems thinking, complex responsive processes, and systems intelligence , 2007 .

[33]  Donald MacLean,et al.  Complexity Theory and Strategic Change: An Empirically Informed Critique , 2005 .

[34]  Martin J. Eppler.  Knowledge Communication Problems between Experts and Decision Makers: an Overview and Classification , 2007 .

[35]  I. Wallerstein,et al.  開放社會科學 : 重建社會科學報告書 = Open the social sciences : report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the restructuring of the social sciences , 1997 .

[36]  Jane Klobas,et al.  Building Knowledge in Projects: A Practical Application of Social Constructivism to information Systems Development , 2008 .

[37]  Violina Ratcheva,et al.  Integrating diverse knowledge through boundary spanning processes – The case of multidisciplinary project teams , 2009 .

[38]  Snunith Shoham,et al.  Knowledge processes: from managing people to managing processes , 2008, J. Knowl. Manag..

[39]  Michael A. Chilton,et al.  The Dimensions of Tacit & Explicit Knowledge: A Description and Measure , 2008, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..