Geometry-induced protein pattern formation

Significance Biological cells need the ability to guide intracellular processes to specific spatial locations. This requires biochemical processes to sense and adapt to the geometry of the organism. Previously suggested mechanisms either assume proteins that are able to directly sense membrane curvature or are based on nonlinear diffusion–reaction systems that can generate geometry-adapted patterns. The latter, however, requires fine-tuning of the reaction rates. Here, we show that geometry adaption already follows from generic chemical dynamics. We present a simple reaction module based on generic reactions that establishes geometry-dependent patterns robustly without the need to tune kinetic rates nor any explicit curvature-sensing mechanism. Protein patterns are known to adapt to cell shape and serve as spatial templates that choreograph downstream processes like cell polarity or cell division. However, how can pattern-forming proteins sense and respond to the geometry of a cell, and what mechanistic principles underlie pattern formation? Current models invoke mechanisms based on dynamic instabilities arising from nonlinear interactions between proteins but neglect the influence of the spatial geometry itself. Here, we show that patterns can emerge as a direct result of adaptation to cell geometry, in the absence of dynamical instability. We present a generic reaction module that allows protein densities robustly to adapt to the symmetry of the spatial geometry. The key component is an NTPase protein that cycles between nucleotide-dependent membrane-bound and cytosolic states. For elongated cells, we find that the protein dynamics generically leads to a bipolar pattern, which vanishes as the geometry becomes spherically symmetrical. We show that such a reaction module facilitates universal adaptation to cell geometry by sensing the local ratio of membrane area to cytosolic volume. This sensing mechanism is controlled by the membrane affinities of the different states. We apply the theory to explain AtMinD bipolar patterns in Δ EcMinDE Escherichia coli. Due to its generic nature, the mechanism could also serve as a hitherto-unrecognized spatial template in many other bacterial systems. Moreover, the robustness of the mechanism enables self-organized optimization of protein patterns by evolutionary processes. Finally, the proposed module can be used to establish geometry-sensitive protein gradients in synthetic biological systems.

[1]  M. Howard,et al.  Dynamic compartmentalization of bacteria: accurate division in E. coli. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[2]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Dynamic membrane patterning, signal localization and polarity in living cells. , 2015, Soft matter.

[3]  David Fange,et al.  Noise-Induced Min Phenotypes in E. coli , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Highly canalized MinD transfer and MinE sequestration explain the origin of robust MinCDE-protein dynamics. , 2012, Cell reports.

[5]  R. Itoh,et al.  Chloroplast division site placement requires dimerization of the ARC11/AtMinD1 protein in Arabidopsis , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[6]  S. Alonso,et al.  Phase separation and bistability in a three-dimensional model for protein domain formation at biomembranes , 2010, Physical biology.

[7]  Erwin Frey,et al.  GDI-Mediated Cell Polarization in Yeast Provides Precise Spatial and Temporal Control of Cdc42 Signaling , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Daniel St Johnston,et al.  Seeing Is Believing The Bicoid Morphogen Gradient Matures , 2004, Cell.

[9]  Yu-Ling Shih,et al.  Division site placement in E.coli: mutations that prevent formation of the MinE ring lead to loss of the normal midcell arrest of growth of polar MinD membrane domains , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[10]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  A Curvature-Mediated Mechanism for Localization of Lipids to Bacterial Poles , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Timothy J. Mitchison,et al.  The bacterial cell division proteins FtsA and FtsZ self-organize into dynamic cytoskeletal patterns , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[12]  Andrew D. Rutenberg,et al.  Dynamic Compartmentalization of Bacteria , 2001 .

[13]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Dynamic structures in Escherichia coli: Spontaneous formation of MinE rings and MinD polar zones , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Ravi Iyengar,et al.  Decoding Information in Cell Shape , 2013, Cell.

[15]  Karsten Kruse,et al.  Min-oscillations in Escherichia coli induced by interactions of membrane-bound proteins , 2005, Physical biology.

[16]  Cassie Aldridge,et al.  The Plastid Division Protein AtMinD1 Is a Ca2+-ATPase Stimulated by AtMinE1* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  P A de Boer,et al.  Rapid pole-to-pole oscillation of a protein required for directing division to the middle of Escherichia coli. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Elf,et al.  Single-particle tracking reveals that free ribosomal subunits are not excluded from the Escherichia coli nucleoid , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  H. Meinhardt,et al.  Pattern formation in Escherichia coli: A model for the pole-to-pole oscillations of Min proteins and the localization of the division site , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  G. Meacci,et al.  Mobility of Min-proteins in Escherichia coli measured by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy , 2006, Physical biology.

[21]  P. Schwille,et al.  Min protein patterns emerge from rapid rebinding and membrane interaction of MinE , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[22]  J. Lutkenhaus,et al.  Dynamic assembly of MinD on phospholipid vesicles regulated by ATP and MinE , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Zhang,et al.  A plant MinD homologue rescues Escherichia coli HL1 mutant (ΔMinDE) in the absence of MinE , 2009, BMC Microbiology.

[24]  Lani Wu,et al.  Spontaneous Cell Polarization Through Actomyosin-Based Delivery of the Cdc42 GTPase , 2003, Science.

[25]  J. Lutkenhaus,et al.  Assembly dynamics of the bacterial MinCDE system and spatial regulation of the Z ring. , 2007, Annual review of biochemistry.

[26]  J. Errington,et al.  Localisation of DivIVA by targeting to negatively curved membranes , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[27]  C. Sáez,et al.  Analysis of MinD Mutations Reveals Residues Required for MinE Stimulation of the MinD ATPase and Residues Required for MinC Interaction , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  K. C. Huang,et al.  The Min System as a General Cell Geometry Detection Mechanism: Branch Lengths in Y-Shaped Escherichia coli Cells Affect Min Oscillation Patterns and Division Dynamics , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[29]  L. Hamoen,et al.  Finding the corners in a cell. , 2012, Current opinion in microbiology.