Comparison of manikin versus porcine models in cricothyrotomy procedure training

Objective: To compare the usefulness for training of a porcine model (larynx, trachea, and pig skin) and a manikin model using a Portex cricothyrotomy kit (PCK). Methods: In a prospective randomised crossover trial, participants in the airway workshop performed crico-thyrotomy using a PCK on the porcine and manikin models (Tracheostomy Trainer and Case). The porcine model was made with larynxes and trachea from freshly slaughtered pigs and covered with a piece of thinned pigskin stapled to a wooden board. Participants were asked to assess the following: reality of skin turgor; difficulty with skin penetration, landmark recognition and procedure; reality of the model; and preference for each model using a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0–10 cm. The VAS scores for each model were compared. Results: 49 participants were included in the study. Mean (SD) VAS scores for the reality of skin turgor, degree of difficulty with skin penetration and landmark recognition were higher with the porcine model than with the manikin model (7.0 (2.1) vs 4.7 (2.0), 6.4 (2.4) vs 3.6 (2.2), 5.1 (2.2) vs 4.2 (2.5), respectively). There was no difference between the models in the difficulty of the procedure (5.0 (2.4) vs 4.7 (3.2)). The porcine model had a higher VAS score for overall reality and preference of the model (7.1 (2.0) vs 4.8 (2.3) and 7.1 (2.0) vs 4.8 (2.2), respectively). Conclusion: The porcine model is a more useful training tool than the manikin model for cricothyrotomy with PCK because of its reality and similarity to human anatomy.

[1]  Americancollegeofemergencyphy,et al.  Core content for emergency medicine , 1991 .

[2]  P. Dunkley,et al.  Technique training: endoscopic percutaneous tracheostomy. , 1998, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  A K McIndoe,et al.  Comparison of four different emergency airway access equipment sets on a human patient simulator * , 2004, Anaesthesia.

[4]  M. Nelson Models for teaching emergency medicine skills. , 1990, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  S. Yentis,et al.  Training in airway management , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[6]  J. Kline,et al.  Emergency department resuscitative procedures: animal laboratory training improves procedural competency and speed. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[7]  H. Marres,et al.  Emergency cricothyrotomy: a randomised crossover trial comparing the wire‐guided and catheter‐over‐needle techniques , 2004, Anaesthesia.

[8]  R. Hamilton,et al.  Declining rate of cricothyrotomy in trauma patients with an emergency medicine residency: implications for skills training. , 1998, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[9]  F. Chung,et al.  What Is the Minimum Training Required for Successful Cricothyroidotomy?: A Study in Mannequins , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[10]  C. Brown,et al.  Animal procedure laboratory surveys: use of the animal laboratory to improve physician confidence and ability. , 1989, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  J. Cheong The use of animals in medical education: A question of necessity vs. desirability , 1989, Theoretical medicine.

[12]  R. Vaughan Training in airway management , 2007, Anaesthesia.

[13]  P. Bijur,et al.  Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[14]  Pam Aitchison,et al.  An Innovative and Inexpensive Model for Teaching Cricothyrotomy , 2007, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[15]  E. Gallagher,et al.  Emergency procedures important to the training of emergency medicine residents: who performs them in the emergency department? , 1995, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.