Oscillations of two competing microbial populations in configurations of two interconnected chemostats.

It is known that, when two microbial populations competing for a single rate-limiting nutrient are grown in a spatially uniform environment, such as a single chemostat, with competition being the only interaction between them, they cannot coexist, but eventually one of the two populations prevails and the other becomes extinct. Spatial heterogeneity has been suggested as a means of obtaining coexistence of the two populations. A configuration of two interconnected chemostats is a simple model of a spatially heterogeneous environment. It has been shown that, when Monod's model is used for the specific growth rates of the two populations, steady-state coexistence can be obtained in such systems for wide ranges of operating conditions. In the present work, we study a model of microbial competition in configurations of interconnected chemostats and we show that, if a substrate inhibition model is used for the specific growth rates of the two populations, coexistence in a periodic state is also possible. The analysis of the model is done by numerical bifurcation theory methods.

[1]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Single-nutrient microbial competition: qualitative agreement between experimental and theoretically forecast outcomes. , 1980, Science.

[2]  J W Wimpenny,et al.  The gradostat: a bidirectional compound chemostat and its application in microbiological research. , 1981, Journal of general microbiology.

[3]  Hal L. Smith.  Equilibrium distribution of species among vessels of a gradostat , 1991 .

[4]  Sze-Bi Hsu,et al.  Limiting Behavior for Competing Species , 1978 .

[5]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Competition in the gradostat: the global stability problem , 1994 .

[6]  Willi Jäger,et al.  Competition in the gradostat , 1987 .

[7]  Paul Waltman,et al.  A nonlinear boundary value problem arising from competition in the chemostat , 1989 .

[8]  J. Monod,et al.  Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes , 1942 .

[9]  B. C. Baltzis,et al.  Impossibility of coexistence of three pure and simple competitors in configurations of three interconnected chemostats , 1989, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  Sze-Bi Hsu,et al.  A Mathematical Theory for Single-Nutrient Competition in Continuous Cultures of Micro-Organisms , 1977 .

[11]  A. A. S. Zaghrout.  Asymptotic behavior of solutions of competition in gradostat with two limiting complementary substrates , 1992 .

[12]  I. Kevrekidis,et al.  Microbial predation in coupled chemostats: a global study of two coupled nonlinear oscillators. , 1994, Mathematical biosciences.

[13]  B. C. Baltzis,et al.  The growth of pure and simple microbial competitors in a moving distributed medium. , 1992, Mathematical biosciences.

[14]  Paul Waltman,et al.  Competition in an n -vessel gradostat , 1991 .

[15]  Gail S. K. Wolkowicz,et al.  Global dynamics of a mathematical model of competition in the chemostat: general response functions and differential death rates , 1992 .

[16]  B. C. Baltzis,et al.  Steady-state coexistence of three pure and simple competitors in a four-membered reactor network. , 1994, Mathematical biosciences.

[17]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Effect of spatial inhomogeneities on the coexistence of competing microbial populations , 1979 .

[18]  J. Meers.  Effect of dilution rate on the outcome of chemostat mixed culture experiments. , 1971, Journal of general microbiology.

[19]  Arthur E. Humphrey,et al.  Dynamics of a chemostat in which two organisms compete for a common substrate , 1977 .

[20]  John F. Andrews,et al.  A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates , 1968 .

[21]  Sze-Bi Hsu,et al.  Analysis of a model of two competitors in a chemostat with an external inhibitor , 1992 .

[22]  E. Powell.  Criteria for the growth of contaminants and mutants in continuous culture. , 1958, Journal of general microbiology.

[23]  G. E. Powell.  Structural instability of the theory of simple competition , 1988 .

[24]  B. C. Baltzis,et al.  Operating parameters' effects on the outcome of pure and simple competition between two populations in configurations of two interconnected chemostats , 1987, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[25]  H. M. Tsuchiya,et al.  Interactions of Tetrahymena pyriformis, Escherichia coli, Azotobacter vinelandii, and Glucose in a Minimal Medium , 1973, Journal of bacteriology.

[26]  Hal L. Smith,et al.  Competition in the gradostat: the role of the communication rate , 1989 .

[27]  Gail S. K. Wolkowicz,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF THE CHEMOSTAT WITH A GENERAL CLASS OF FUNCTIONS DESCRIBING NUTRIENT UPTAKE , 1985 .

[28]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  A stochastic analysis of the growth of competing microbial populations in a continuous biochemical reactor , 1979 .

[29]  B. C. Baltzis,et al.  Competition of two microbial populations for a single resource in a chemostat when one of them exhibits wall attachment , 1983, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[30]  R. Lenski,et al.  Coexistence of two competitors on one resource and one inhibitor: a chemostat model based on bacteria and antibiotics. , 1986, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  P. Lenas,et al.  Periodic, quasi-periodic, and chaotic coexistence of two competing microbial populations in a periodically operated chemostat. , 1994, Mathematical biosciences.

[32]  S Pavlou,et al.  Coexistence of three competing microbial populations in a chemostat with periodically varying dilution rate. , 1995, Mathematical biosciences.