Measuring polycentricity via network flows, spatial interaction and percolation

Polycentricity, or the number of central urban places, is commonly measured by location-based metrics (e.g. employment density/total number of workers, above a threshold). While these metrics are good indicators of location ‘centricity’, results are sensitive to threshold choice. We consider the alternative idea that a centre’s status depends on its connectivity to other locations through trip inflows/outflows: this is inherently a network rather than place idea. Three flow and network-based centricity metrics for measuring metropolitan area polycentricity using journey-to-work data are presented: (a) trip-based; (b) density-based; and (c) accessibility-based. Using these measures, polycentricity is computed and rank-centricity distributions are plotted to test Zipf-like or Christaller-like behaviours. Further, a percolation theory framework is proposed for the full origin–destination matrix, where trip flows are used as a thresholding parameter to count the number of sub-centres. Trip flows prove to be an effective measure to count and hierarchically organise metropolitan areas and sub-centres, tackling the arbitrariness of defining any threshold on employment statistics to count sub-centres. Applications on data from the Greater Sydney region show that the proposed framework helps to characterise polycentricity and sub-regional organisation more robustly, and provide unexpected insights into the connections between land use, labour market organisation, transport and urban structure.

[1]  Masahisa Fujita,et al.  Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations , 1982 .

[2]  D. R. Ingram The concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form , 1971 .

[3]  M. Barthelemy,et al.  Modeling the polycentric transition of cities. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[4]  D. McMillen,et al.  The number of subcenters in large urban areas , 2003 .

[5]  P. M. Ache,et al.  The Polycentric Metropolis. Learning from Mega-city Regions in Europe , 2008 .

[6]  S. Sarkar Urban scaling and the geographic concentration of inequalities by city size , 2019 .

[7]  E. Meijers Measuring Polycentricity and its Promises , 2008 .

[8]  B. Derudder,et al.  Measuring Polycentric Urban Development in China: An Intercity Transportation Network Perspective , 2016 .

[9]  J. B. Parr,et al.  The Polycentric Urban Region: A Closer Inspection , 2004 .

[10]  N. Green Functional Polycentricity: A Formal Definition in Terms of Social Network Analysis , 2007 .

[11]  Soong Moon Kang,et al.  Structure of Urban Movements: Polycentric Activity and Entangled Hierarchical Flows , 2010, PloS one.

[12]  B. Berry,et al.  Central places in Southern Germany , 1967 .

[13]  K. Small,et al.  URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE. , 1997 .

[14]  D. McMillen Nonparametric Employment Subcenter Identification , 2001 .

[15]  M. Batty The New Science of Cities , 2013 .

[16]  M. Wachs,et al.  PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY AS A SOCIAL INDICATOR , 1973 .

[17]  William L. Garrison,et al.  A Note on Central Place Theory and the Range of a Good , 1958 .

[18]  Robert Freestone,et al.  POLYCENTRICITY OR DISPERSION?: CHANGES IN CENTER EMPLOYMENT IN METROPOLITAN SYDNEY, 1981 TO 1996 , 2000 .

[19]  P. M. Allen,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Growth in a Central Place System , 2010 .

[20]  Robert Freestone,et al.  Metropolitan Restructuring and Suburban Employment Centers: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Australian Experience , 1998 .

[21]  J. Eeckhout Gibrat's Law for (All) Cities , 2004 .

[22]  Antti Vasanen Functional Polycentricity: Examining Metropolitan Spatial Structure through the Connectivity of Urban Sub-centres , 2012 .

[23]  Kathy Pain,et al.  The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega-City Regions in Europe , 2009 .

[24]  G V Wickstrom,et al.  DEFINING BALANCED TRANSPORTATION-A QUESTION OF OPPORTUNITY , 1971 .

[25]  X. Gabaix Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .

[26]  G. Giuliano,et al.  SUBCENTERS IN THE LOS ANGELES REGION , 1991 .

[27]  D. Levinson Accessibility and the Journey to Work , 1998 .

[28]  Jorge Alberto Montejano Escamilla,et al.  Contesting Mexico City’s alleged polycentric condition through a centrality-mixed land-use composite index , 2016 .

[29]  B. Berry,et al.  RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF CENTRAL PLACE THEORY , 2005 .

[30]  Ron Johnston,et al.  THE Distribution OF AN INTRA‐METROPOLITAN CENTRAL PLACE HIERARCHY , 1966 .

[31]  P. Phibbs,et al.  The scaling of income distribution in Australia: Possible relationships between urban allometry, city size, and economic inequality , 2018 .

[32]  M. Barthelemy,et al.  From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities , 2014, Scientific Reports.