A numerical study on the optimal geometric design of speed control humps

The aim of the present paper is to find an optimum speed control hump geometric design by using the sequential quadratic programming method. Theoretical investigation of the dynamic behavior of the driver body components and the vehicle due to crossing speed control humps is presented. The vehicle–driver system represented as a mathematical model consists of 12 degrees of freedom (DOF). Seven DOFs are used for the human body model in the heave mode and the rest are for the vehicle body, suspension system and tires. An optimum design method for the hump geometry is proposed to reduce the excessive shocks experienced by drivers when crossing the hump below the speed limit, while being unpleasant when going over the speed limit. The pleasant or unpleasant ride, or what is called comfort criteria (CC), is modeled by calculating the driver's head acceleration. In this regard, the geometry of the hump will be controlled to match an optimum practical shape that can be implemented economically. Three types of humps are discussed and evaluated in the optimization technique. These humps are Watts, flat-topped and polynomial humps. For Watts and flat-topped humps, different rise and return profiles which are used as design variables, are sinusoidal, harmonic, cycloidal, circular and modified harmonic. The global design was selected from 42 optimal designs which are found by combining different rise/return profiles for the three types of humps. The effect of special cases such as symmetrical roads, design limitations, CC, critical speed (CS) and system parametric variations on the optimal design of speed control humps are presented at the end of this paper.

[1]  Ken'ichi Maemori,et al.  Optimum design of speed control humps for vehicles. , 1988 .

[2]  M J Griffin,et al.  Modelling the dynamic mechanisms associated with the principal resonance of the seated human body. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  Gordon R. Pennock,et al.  Theory of Machines and Mechanisms , 1965 .

[4]  Manuel S. Pereira,et al.  Crashworthiness of transportation systems : structural impact and occupant protection , 1997 .

[5]  G R Watts.  ROAD HUMPS FOR THE CONTROL OF VEHICLE SPEEDS , 1973 .

[6]  Mohamed Bouazara,et al.  An optimization method designed to improve 3-D vehicle comfort and road holding capability through the use of active and semi-active suspensions , 2001 .

[7]  P. Bandel,et al.  Simulation Model of the Dynamic Behavior of a Tire Running Over an Obstacle , 1988 .

[8]  Subhash Rakheja,et al.  Whole-body vertical biodynamic response characteristics of the seated vehicle driver: measurement and model development , 1998 .

[9]  Himmat S. Chadda,et al.  Speed (Road) Bumps: Issues and Opinions , 1985 .

[10]  M. Griffin,et al.  Resonance behaviour of the seated human body and effects of posture. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  Optimization Toolbox User's Guide , 1998 .

[12]  J R Jarvis.  AN INVESTIGATION OF ROAD HUMPS FOR USE ON BUS ROUTES , 1992 .

[13]  Niels Leergaard Pedersen,et al.  Shape optimization of a vehicle speed control bump , 1998 .

[14]  Yong-San Yoon,et al.  Biomechanical model of human on seat with backrest for evaluating ride quality , 2001 .

[15]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Traffic Calming Practice Revisited , 2005 .

[16]  Paul I. Ro,et al.  An Accurate Full Car Ride Model Using Model Reducing Techniques , 2002 .

[17]  Y. N. Al-Nassar,et al.  Dynamic considerations of speed control humps , 1982 .

[18]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Traffic Calming: State of the Practice , 1999 .

[19]  Tien Fang Fwa,et al.  RATIONAL APPROACH FOR GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF SPEED-CONTROL ROAD HUMPS , 1992 .

[20]  H. M. Lankarani.  Current Issues Regarding Aircraft Crash Injury Protection , 1997 .

[21]  D E Clark.  ALL-WAY STOPS VERSUS SPEED HUMPS: WHICH IS MORE EFFECTIVE AT SLOWING TRAFFIC SPEEDS? , 2000 .

[22]  C J Lines.  Road humps for the control of vehicle speeds , 1993 .