Conscious and unconscious proportion effects in masked priming

The global neuronal workspace theory [Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1-37.] proposes that it is impossible for an unconscious stimulus to be used strategically to enhance task performance (bottom-up effect), while a fully consciously perceived stimulus can be used to improve task performance (top-down effect). Two experiments were designed to investigate these hypotheses. In a first experiment we investigated whether a manipulation of the proportion of Arabic/number word targets had a top-down effect. Since the subjects were fully aware of the target, we expected that this manipulation could be used to enhance task performance. In a second experiment we determined whether a manipulation of the proportion of Arabic/number word primes had a bottom-up effect. Since the subjects were unaware of the prime, we hypothesized that they would be unable to use the manipulation to enhance task performance and therefore the manipulation would have no effect. Both hypotheses were largely confirmed.

[1]  W Fias,et al.  Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect , 2001, Psychological research.

[2]  J. Changeux,et al.  Neural Mechanisms for Access to Consciousness , 2004 .

[3]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Cross-notation number priming investigated at different stimulus onset asynchronies in parity and naming tasks. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[4]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies? , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[5]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Long-term semantic memory versus contextual memory in unconscious number processing. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  K. Yu,et al.  Attentional modulation of sensorimotor processes in the absence of perceptual awareness , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  J. Changeux,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006 Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2022 .

[8]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[9]  M. Masson,et al.  Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition , 2003, Cognition.

[11]  M. Masson,et al.  Prime Validity Affects Masked Repetition Priming: Evidence for an Episodic Resource Account of Priming , 2001 .

[12]  Glen E Bodner,et al.  Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[13]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious Masked Priming Depends on Temporal Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[14]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .