The premotor theory of attention as an account for the Simon effect.

The Simon effect refers to the phenomenon that responses are faster when the irrelevant location of a stimulus corresponds with the response location than when these locations do not correspond. In the current paper we examined the viability of an updated version of the premotor theory of attention (PMTA) as an account for the Simon effect. Two predictions were evaluated. First, in the case of focused attention at the relevant target position a strong reduction of the Simon effect should be observed as the Simon effect according to PMTA crucially depends on attentional orienting. Secondly, if attention is directed towards a location then this orienting by itself should already be sufficient for producing a Simon effect, as stimulus presence is not required. Our data confirmed these predictions thereby supporting the relevance of the PMTA for the Simon effect.

[1]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Edmund Wascher,et al.  Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  M Eimer,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  R Verleger,et al.  Dimensional overlap between arrows as cueing stimuli and responses?. Evidence from contra-ipsilateral differences in EEG potentials. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes , 1994, Psychological research.

[7]  Robin Walker,et al.  Control of voluntary and reflexive saccades , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  U. Ansorge,et al.  A Simon effect in memory retrieval: Evidence for the response-discrimination account , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  H. Deubel,et al.  Selective Dorsal and Ventral Processing: Evidence for a Common Attentional Mechanism in Reaching and Perception , 1998 .

[11]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  Selective Attention in Vision , 1991 .

[12]  U. Ansorge,et al.  Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Rob H. J. van der Lubbe,et al.  The Involvement of Occipital Cortex in the Early Blind in Auditory and Tactile Duration Discrimination Tasks , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Verleger,et al.  Mechanisms underlying spatial coding in a multiple-item Simon task , 2005, Psychological research.

[15]  Rob H. J. van der Lubbe,et al.  Interruption from irrelevant auditory and visual onsets even when attention is in a focused state , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Edmund Wascher,et al.  Response coding in the Simon task , 2007, Psychological research.

[17]  R. Klein,et al.  Does Oculomotor Readiness Mediate Cognitive Control of Visual-Attention - Revisited , 1994 .

[18]  J. C. Woestenburg,et al.  The influence of peripheral precues on the tendency to react towards a lateral relevant stimulus with multiple-item arrays , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[19]  E. Soetens,et al.  Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  R. V. D. Van der Lubbe,et al.  Endogenous orienting modulates the Simon effect: critical factors in experimental design , 2007, Psychological research.

[21]  B. Hommel,et al.  A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task , 2004, Psychological research.

[22]  B. Hommel.  Inverting the Simon effect by intention , 1993 .

[23]  U. Ansorge,et al.  A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  C. Umilta,et al.  Simon effect with and without awareness of the accessory stimulus. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  A. H. C. van der Heijden.  Attention in Vision: Perception, Communication and Action , 2004 .

[26]  Wim Notebaert,et al.  Sequential analysis of a Simon task – evidence for an attention-shift account , 2001, Psychological research.

[27]  J. R. Simon.  The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing , 1990 .

[28]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Processing auditory information: interaction of two population stereotypes. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  T. Stoffer,et al.  The functional role of attention for spatial coding in the Simon effect , 1994, Psychological research.

[30]  Elger L Abrahamse,et al.  The premotor theory of attention and the Simon effect. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[31]  R. Verleger,et al.  Spatiotemporal overlap between brain activation related to saccade preparation and attentional orienting , 2006, Brain Research.

[32]  S. Brandt,et al.  Executive control over response priming and conflict: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Functional Organization of Human Intraparietal and Frontal Cortex for Attending, Looking, and Pointing , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  C Iani,et al.  The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  A. Postma,et al.  Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[38]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Topic: Cognition , 2003 .

[39]  L. Zimba,et al.  Attention precuing and Simon effects: A test of the attention-coding account of the Simon effect , 1995 .

[40]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  B. Hommel.  Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[42]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Responding to object files: Automatic integration of spatial information revealed by stimulus-response compatibility effects , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[43]  R. Klein,et al.  The components of visual attention and the ubiquitous Simon effect. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[44]  B. Hommel.  Inverting the Simon effect intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. , 1993 .

[45]  John Christie,et al.  On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[46]  Marijn E. Struiksma,et al.  What is the link between language and spatial images? Behavioral and neural findings in blind and sighted individuals. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[47]  R. Verleger,et al.  Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[49]  R. Lubbe,et al.  FAILURE OF THE EXTENDED CONTINGENT ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE ACCOUNT IN MULTIMODAL SETTINGS , 2006 .

[50]  M. Eimer.  The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[51]  J. Driver,et al.  Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  B. Hommel.  The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 1996 , 49a (3) , 546 571 , 2022 .

[53]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  K. Heilman,et al.  Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Influence of Time Pressure in a Simple Response Task, a Choice- by-Location Task, and the Simon Task , 2001 .

[56]  T. Stoffer.  Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility , 1991, Psychological research.