Achieving the Potential of Health Information Technology

According to the dictionary, “potential” means “existing in possibility.”1 For many of us who desperately want health information technology (IT) to be the long, sought after panacea that will lead to dramatic improvements in quality and safety, there is a strong desire to get to “existing in reality.” A growing sense of awareness and urgency around the current state of health care quality in America continues to push us toward action and health IT. The ability to standardize high-risk processes, such as drug prescribing, and remind providers to order evidence-based preventive services seems so logically connected to better care. There is also a growing sense of impatience among the public with low uptake.

[1]  D. Bates,et al.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. , 1998, JAMA.

[2]  Paul N. Foster,et al.  Leveraging Computerized Sign-Out to Increase Error Reporting and Addressing Patient Safety in Graduate Medical Education , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  C. Vogeli,et al.  Uptake of Electronic Prescribing in Community-Based Practices , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  Frederick Bloom,et al.  Employing the Electronic Health Record to Improve Diabetes Care: A Multifaceted Intervention in an Integrated Delivery System , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  Wei Wu,et al.  The Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry with Clinical Decision Support on the Rates of Adverse Drug Events: A Systematic Review , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[7]  W. Kapoor,et al.  Patient Difficulty Using Tablet Computers to Screen in Primary Care , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[8]  Emily Patterson,et al.  An Evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration’s Clinical Reminders System: A National Survey of Generalists , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Electronic Result Viewing and Quality of Care in Small Group Practices , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[10]  David W. Bates,et al.  Impact of Computerized Decision Support on Blood Pressure Management and Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[11]  Sarah Krein,et al.  Advancing evidence-based care for diabetes: lessons from the Veterans Health Administration. , 2007, Health affairs.

[12]  Jesse C. Crosson,et al.  Variation in Electronic Prescribing Implementation Among Twelve Ambulatory Practices , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[13]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[14]  M. Weinger,et al.  Use of a Handheld Computer Application for Voluntary Medication Event Reporting by Inpatient Nurses and Physicians , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.