Assessment of MODIS cloud effective radius and optical thickness retrievals over the Southeast Pacific with VOCALS‐REx in situ measurements

[1] Cloud microphysical observations collected in situ during the VAMOS Ocean-Cloud-Atmosphere-Land Study Regional Experiment within the Chile-Peru stratocumulus cloud deck during October–November 2008 were used to assess MODIS Level 2 cloud property retrievals. The in situ aircraft-derived cloud property values were constructed from the drop size distributions measured by the Cloud Droplet Probe (drop diameter <52 micron) and Two-Dimensional Cloud Probe (drop diameters up to 1600 micron) during 20 vertical profiles. Almost all of the MODIS cloud scenes were highly homogeneous. MODIS cloud optical thickness correlated well with the aircraft-derived value with a slight offset within instrumental/retrieval uncertainties. In contrast, the standard 2.1 micron-derived MODIS effective radius (re) systematically exceeded the in situ cloud top reby 15%–20%, for an absolute error that increased with droplet size. The individual effective radius retrievals at 1.6, 2.1, and 3.7 micron did not provide additional information on cloud vertical structure for our data sample. The secondarily derived MODIS liquid water path also exceeded the in situ value. A MODIS-derived cloud droplet number concentration (Nd) estimate agreed the best of the four MODIS variables with the aircraft observations. The analysis also highlighted a lack of agreement in published satellite-derivedNd values, despite drawing on the same sources. A best a priori formula choice for Nd is likely to vary regionally. Four sources of errors within the MODIS reretrieval were investigated further: the cloud mode droplet size distribution breadth, the presence of a drizzle mode, above-cloud water vapor absorption, and sensor viewing angles. These processes combined conspired to explain most of the observed bias. The above-cloud water vapor paths were poorly specified, primarily because the cloud top heights are placed too high, and secondarily because the water vapor paths are unrealistic. Improvement of the above-cloud water vapor path specification can most easily and systematically improve the MODIS effective radius and liquid water path retrievals.

[1]  Lorraine Remer,et al.  The Effects of Scattering Angle and Cumulus Cloud Geometry on Satellite Retrievals of Cloud Droplet Effective Radius , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  P. Daum,et al.  Anthropogenic aerosols: Indirect warming effect from dispersion forcing , 2002, Nature.

[3]  P. Comba,et al.  Part I. Theory , 2007 .

[4]  Lu,et al.  Determination of the optical thickness and effective particle radius of clouds from transmitted solar radiation measurements , 2007 .

[5]  Steven Platnick,et al.  A Validation of a Satellite Cloud Retrieval during ASTEX , 1995 .

[6]  James E. Dye,et al.  The Drop-Size Response of the CSIRO Liquid Water Probe , 1987 .

[7]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Impact of three‐dimensional radiative effects on satellite retrievals of cloud droplet sizes , 2006 .

[8]  D. W. Johnson,et al.  The Measurement and Parameterization of Effective Radius of Droplets in Warm Stratocumulus Clouds , 1994 .

[9]  J. Hansen,et al.  Light scattering in planetary atmospheres , 1974 .

[10]  Takashi Nakajima,et al.  Droplet Growth in Warm Water Clouds Observed by the A-Train. Part I: Sensitivity Analysis of the MODIS-Derived Cloud Droplet Sizes , 2010 .

[11]  Ákos Horváth,et al.  Global assessment of AMSR-E and MODIS cloud liquid water path retrievals in warm oceanic clouds , 2009 .

[12]  D. F. Young,et al.  Stratocumulus cloud properties derived from simultaneous satellite and island-based instrumentation during FIRE , 1992 .

[13]  R. Handsworth,et al.  A Hot-Wire Liquid Water Device Having Fully Calculable Response Characteristics. , 1978 .

[14]  B. Albrecht,et al.  Surface‐based remote sensing of the observed and the Adiabatic liquid water content of stratocumulus clouds , 1990 .

[15]  Steven Platnick,et al.  A global view of one‐dimensional solar radiative transfer through oceanic water clouds , 2010 .

[16]  Michael J. Garay,et al.  Comparison of marine stratocumulus cloud top heights in the southeastern Pacific retrieved from satellites with coincident ship-based observations , 2008 .

[17]  Bernhard Mayer,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Technical Note: the Libradtran Software Package for Radiative Transfer Calculations – Description and Examples of Use , 2022 .

[18]  R. Wood,et al.  Subseasonal variability of low cloud radiative properties over the southeast Pacific Ocean , 2009 .

[19]  Z. Li.  The Effect of Droplet Size Distribution on the Determination of Cloud Droplet Effective Radius , 2001 .

[20]  P. Zuidema,et al.  Aircraft millimeter-wave retrievals of cloud liquid water path during VOCALS-REx , 2011 .

[21]  Joshua A. Gordon,et al.  Water droplet calibration of the Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) and in-flight performance in liquid, ice and mixed-phase clouds during ARCPAC , 2010 .

[22]  R. Marchand,et al.  Quantifying the magnitude of anomalous solar absorption , 2003 .

[23]  Steven Platnick,et al.  View‐angle consistency in reflectance, optical thickness and spherical albedo of marine water‐clouds over the northeastern Pacific through MISR‐MODIS fusion , 2009 .

[24]  H. Gerber,et al.  New microphysics sensor for aircraft use , 1994 .

[25]  Southeast pacific stratocumulus: high-frequency variability and mesoscale structures over San Félix Island , 2010 .

[26]  Seiji Kato,et al.  Estimate of satellite‐derived cloud optical thickness and effective radius errors and their effect on computed domain‐averaged irradiances , 2006 .

[27]  Takashi Nakajima,et al.  Droplet Growth in Warm Water Clouds Observed by the A-Train. Part II: A Multisensor View , 2010 .

[28]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  R. Wood,et al.  Southeastern Pacific Coupled Climate Field Experiment , 2008 .

[30]  Alexei Korolev,et al.  NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE Airspeed Corrections for Optical Array Probe Sample Volumes , 1997 .

[31]  Zhien Wang,et al.  Climatology of drizzle in marine boundary layer clouds based on 1 year of data from CloudSat and Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) , 2008 .

[32]  Guangyu Zhao,et al.  Satellite-Observed Location of Stratocumulus Cloud-Top Heights in the Presence of Strong Inversions , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[33]  Steven Platnick,et al.  An assessment of differences between cloud effective particle radius retrievals for marine water clouds from three MODIS spectral bands , 2011 .

[34]  O. Geoffroy,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Cloud Optical Thickness and Liquid Water Path – Does the K Coefficient Vary with Droplet Concentration? , 2022 .

[35]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  The k-distribution method and correlated-k approximation for a shortwave radiative transfer model. , 1999 .

[36]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Vertical Photon Transport in Cloud Remote Sensing Problems , 2013 .

[37]  Marie Doutriaux-Boucher,et al.  A comparison of cloud droplet radii measured from space , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[38]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Open cellular structure in marine stratocumulus sheets , 2008 .

[39]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Southeast Pacific stratocumulus clouds, precipitation and boundary layer structure sampled along 20° S during VOCALS-REx , 2010 .

[40]  S. Twomey,et al.  Inferences of Gross Microphysical Properties of Clouds from Spectral Reflectance Measurements , 1980 .

[41]  C. Fairall,et al.  Measurement of Stratus Cloud and Drizzle Parameters in ASTEX with a K , 1995 .

[42]  Alexander Marshak,et al.  Solar zenith and viewing geometry‐dependent errors in satellite retrieved cloud optical thickness: Marine stratocumulus case , 2009 .

[43]  P. Zuidema,et al.  Stratocumulus Cloud-Top Height Estimates and Their Climatic Implications , 2009 .

[44]  M. King,et al.  Determination of the optical thickness and effective particle radius of clouds from reflected solar , 1990 .

[45]  Wojciech W. Grabowski,et al.  Observations of the width of cloud droplet spectra in stratocumulus , 2006 .

[46]  Bart Geerts,et al.  Identifying drizzle within marine stratus with W-band radar reflectivity , 2003 .

[47]  Robert Wood,et al.  Understanding the Importance of Microphysics and Macrophysics for Warm Rain in Marine Low Clouds. Part II: Heuristic Models of Rain Formation , 2009 .

[48]  Ralf Bennartz,et al.  Global assessment of marine boundary layer cloud droplet number concentration from satellite , 2007 .

[49]  D. Rahn,et al.  Marine boundary layer over the subtropical southeast Pacific during VOCALS-REx – Part 2: Synoptic variability , 2009 .

[50]  T. Kubar,et al.  Understanding the Importance of Microphysics and Macrophysics for Warm Rain in Marine Low Clouds. Part I: Satellite Observations , 2009 .

[51]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Viewing Geometry Dependencies in MODIS Cloud Products , 2010 .

[52]  Paquita Zuidema,et al.  On the validity of the independent pixel approximation for boundary layer clouds observed during ASTEX , 1998 .

[53]  Ralf Bennartz,et al.  Vertical structure of stratiform marine boundary layer clouds and its impact on cloud albedo , 2007 .

[54]  P. Zuidema,et al.  Microphysical variability in southeast Pacific Stratocumulus clouds: synoptic conditions and radiative response , 2010 .

[55]  T. Zinner,et al.  Testing remote sensing on artificial observations: impact of drizzle and 3-D cloud structure on effective radius retrievals , 2010 .

[56]  T. Nakajima,et al.  Wide-Area Determination of Cloud Microphysical Properties from NOAA AVHRR Measurements for FIRE and ASTEX Regions , 1995 .

[57]  M. Miller,et al.  Threshold radar reflectivity for drizzling clouds , 2008 .

[58]  C. Bretherton,et al.  An aircraft case study of the spatial transition from closed to open mesoscale cellular convection over the Southeast Pacific , 2010 .