Pragmatism, Pedagogy and Philosophy A Model of Thought and Action in Action in Primary Technology and Science Teacher Education

This article reports on one outcome from a three-year study with pre-service primary teachers at Goldsmiths' College, University of London. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of participants' prior educational experience and beliefs about the relationship between design & technology (D&T) and science on their lesson planning for these subjects during school placements. Data from the study support a three-domain model of pre-service teachers' thinking and action. When operating within the pragmatic domain, participants are primarily concerned with survival in the classroom, resulting in short-term planning which may contradict their epistemological and curricular beliefs. In the pedagogical domain, the focus shifts from the pre-service teacher themselves and their immediate survival to the learning potential of the activities they plan. There is evidence that some participants have progressed to operating within a philosophical domain, leading to clasroom practice which reflects and re-conceptualises pre-service teachers' core beliefs about the nature of, and relationship between, D&T and science.

[1]  A. Ryan,et al.  Students' Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science , 1992 .

[2]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[3]  Sheila Cory.  Technology in the schools: who'll provide the leadership? , 1991 .

[4]  R. Barr.  New Ideas for Teacher Education. , 1984 .

[5]  P. John.  A Qualitative Study of British Student Teachers’ Lesson Planning Perspectives , 1991 .

[6]  Frederick Ferré.  Philosophy of Technology , 1995 .

[7]  D. Layton,et al.  Technological revolution? : the politics of school science and technology in England and Wales since 1945 , 1985 .

[8]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[9]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[10]  R. Giere.  Science and Technology Studies: Prospects for an Enlightened Postmodern Synthesis , 1993 .

[11]  L. Rennie,et al.  Perceptions About Technology Held by Primary Teachers in England. , 1996 .

[12]  Deborah P. Britzman.  Cultural Myths in the Making of a Teacher: Biography and Social Structure in Teacher Education , 1986 .

[13]  L. Shulman.  Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[14]  Bernadette Hauglustaine‐Charlier.  Why Do We Want to Change Teachers’ Beliefs and How Could We Support These Changes? The Case of Conceptions of Learning , 1997 .

[15]  M. Rogers,et al.  Pre-service Primary Teachers' Planning for Science and Technology Activities: Influences and constraints , 2000 .

[16]  D. P. Lauda.  Technology Education: A Fundamental Framework for Improved Capability in Math and Science. , 1985 .

[17]  M. Bonnett,et al.  Primary Partnership Matters: some views from the profession , 1994 .

[18]  H. Tillema.  Stability and Change in Student Teachers’ Beliefs , 1997 .

[19]  Srdjan Lelas,et al.  Science as Technology , 1993, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[20]  U. Zoller,et al.  Views of Prospective Teachers versus Practicing Teachers about Science, Technology and Society Issues , 1994 .

[21]  D. Layton.  Technology's challenge to science education , 1993 .

[22]  Colin Lacey,et al.  The socialization of teachers , 1977 .

[23]  Sarah Tann.  Eliciting Student Teachers’ Personal Theories , 2003 .

[24]  Paul L. Gardner,et al.  Representations of the Relationship between Science and Technology in the Curriculum , 1994 .