Volatility estimation for stochastic project value models

One of the key parameters in modeling capital budgeting decisions for investments with embedded options is the project volatility. Most often, however, there is no market or historical data available to provide an accurate estimate for this parameter. A common approach to estimating the project volatility in such instances is to use a Monte Carlo simulation where one or more sources of uncertainty are consolidated into a single stochastic process for the project cash flows, from which the volatility parameter can be determined. Nonetheless, the simulation estimation method originally suggested for this purpose systematically overstates the project volatility, which can result in incorrect option values and non-optimal investment decisions. Examples that illustrate this issue numerically have appeared in several recent papers, along with revised estimation methods that address this problem. In this article, we extend that work by showing analytically the source of the overestimation bias and the adjustment necessary to remove it. We then generalize this development for the cases of levered cash flows and non-constant volatility. In each case, we use an example problem to show how a revised estimation methodology can be applied.

[1]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[2]  Sheridan Titman,et al.  Valuation: The Art and Science of Corporate Investment Decisions , 2007 .

[3]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[4]  Peter Tufano,et al.  The Determinants of Stock Price Exposure: Financial Engineering and the Gold Mining Industry , 1998 .

[5]  L. Trigeorgis Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation , 1996 .

[6]  G. Friedl Copeland, Tom/Antikarov, Vladimir, Real Options. A Practitioner’s Guide, Texere LLC, New York 2001, $ 59,95 , 2002 .

[7]  Hemantha S. B. Herath,et al.  MULTI-STAGE CAPITAL INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES AS COMPOUND REAL Options , 2002 .

[8]  R. Raz,et al.  Response to Comments on , 2012, Journal of child neurology.

[9]  T. Copeland Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2001 .

[10]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Using Binomial Decision Trees to Solve Real-Option Valuation Problems , 2005, Decis. Anal..

[11]  António A. F. Santos Monte Carlo Estimation of Project Volatility for Real Options Analysis , 2006 .

[12]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Response to Comments on Brandão et al. (2005) , 2005, Decis. Anal..

[13]  Luiz Eduardo Teixeira Brandão,et al.  Real Options Valuation of e-learning Projects , 2010 .

[14]  D. Siegel,et al.  Option Valuation of Claims on Real Assets: The Case of Offshore Petroleum Leases , 1988 .

[15]  J. Hull Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives , 1989 .

[16]  John M. Charnes,et al.  REAL OPTIONS VOLATILITY ESTIMATION WITH CORRELATED INPUTS , 2004 .

[17]  Stein-Erik Fleten,et al.  Investment timing and optimal capacity choice for small hydropower projects , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Luiz Eduardo Teixeira Brandão,et al.  Valuation of a Power Plant with the Real Options Approach , 2008 .

[19]  L. E. Brandão,et al.  The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects , 2008 .

[20]  James E. Smith,et al.  Alternative Approaches for Solving Real-Options Problems: (Comment on Brandão et al. 2005) , 2005, Decis. Anal..

[21]  S. Suslick,et al.  Estimating the volatility of mining projects considering price and operating cost uncertainties , 2006 .

[22]  Aneel Keswani,et al.  How real option disinvestment flexibility augments project NPV , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Graham A. Davis,et al.  Estimating Volatility and Dividend Yield When Valuing Real Options to Invest or Abandon , 1998 .