Technological innovation systems for biorefineries: a review of the literature

The concept of a bioeconomy can be understood as an economy where the basic building blocks for materials, chemicals and energy are derived from renewable biological resources. Biorefineries are considered an integral part of the development towards a future sustainable bioeconomy. The purpose of this literature review is to synthesize current knowledge about how biorefinery technologies are being developed, deployed, and diffused, and to identify actors, networks and institutions relevant for these processes. A number of key findings can be obtained from the literature. First, investing more resources in R&D will not help to enable biorefineries to cross the ‘valley of death’ towards greater commercial investments. Second, while the importance and need for entrepreneurship and the engagement of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is generally acknowledged, there is no agreement how to facilitate conditions for entrepreneurs and SMEs to enter into the field of biorefineries. Third, visions for biorefinery technologies and products have focused very much on biofuels and bioenergy with legislation and regulation playing an instrumental role in creating a market for these products. But there is a clear need to incentivize non-energy products to encourage investments in biorefineries. Finally, policy support for biorefinery developments and products are heavily intertwined with wider discussions around legitimacy and social acceptance.

[1]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[2]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  The development of forest-based biorefineries: implications for market behavior and policy. , 2009 .

[3]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  Prospective analysis of technological innovation systems: Identifying technological and organizational development options for biogas in Switzerland , 2009 .

[4]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Unpacking investment decisions in biorefineries , 2015 .

[5]  K. McCormick,et al.  Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies , 2015 .

[6]  Kes McCormick,et al.  Biorefineries in Sweden: Perspectives on the opportunities, challenges and future , 2016 .

[7]  Romain Debref,et al.  The Paradoxes of Environmental Innovations: The Case of Green Chemistry , 2012 .

[8]  S. Laestadius Biotechnology and the Potential for a Radical Shift of Technology in Forest Industry , 2000 .

[9]  Y. Voytenko Pathways for agro‐bioenergy transition in Ukraine , 2012 .

[10]  H. Lundberg Triple Helix in practice: the key role of boundary spanners , 2013 .

[11]  Joakim Björkdahl,et al.  Organizational climate and capabilities for innovation: a study of nine forest-based Nordic manufacturing firms , 2011 .

[12]  James H. Clark,et al.  Green chemistry for the second generation biorefinery—sustainable chemical manufacturing based on biomass , 2007 .

[13]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Biorefinery systems – potential contributors to sustainable innovation , 2010 .

[14]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology , 2004 .

[15]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[16]  Veronika Dornburg,et al.  Scenario projections for future market potentials of biobased bulk chemicals. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Innovation Policy for Grand Challenges. An Economic Geography Perspective , 2015 .

[18]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims , 2009 .

[19]  P. Cooke,et al.  Transition regions: Regional–national eco-innovation systems and strategies , 2011 .

[20]  A. Näyhä,et al.  Diffusion of forest biorefineries in Scandinavia and North America , 2012 .

[21]  A. Näyhä,et al.  Strategic change in the forest industry towards the biorefining business , 2014 .

[22]  P. Fairbrother,et al.  Skill development in the transition to a ‘green economy’: A ‘varieties of capitalism’ analysis , 2014 .

[23]  K. Menrad,et al.  Interest of industrial actors in biorefinery concepts in Europe , 2009 .

[24]  B. Elbersen,et al.  Cascading use: a systematic approach to biomass beyond the energy sector , 2013 .

[25]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass: opportunities, perspectives, and potential of biorefinery systems , 2011 .

[26]  Rajni Hatti-Kaul,et al.  Biorefineries- A Path to Sustainability? , 2010 .

[27]  E. Hansen,et al.  The Role of Innovation in the Forest Products Industry , 2010, Journal of Forestry.

[28]  Philip Peck,et al.  Organisational frameworks for straw-based energy systems in Sweden and Denmark , 2012 .

[29]  M. Ollikainen Forestry in bioeconomy – smart green growth for the humankind , 2014 .

[30]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field. , 2015 .

[31]  J. Philp,et al.  Biorefining policy needs to come of age. , 2014, Trends in biotechnology.

[32]  Paul Stuart The forest biorefinery : Survival strategy for canada's pulp and paper sector? , 2006 .

[33]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[34]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Explaining regime destabilisation in the pulp and paper industry , 2012 .

[35]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics , 2015 .

[36]  Mikael Ottosson Opposition and Adjustment to Industrial‘Greening’ : The Swedish Forest Industry’s (Re)Actions regarding Energy Transition – 1989-2009 , 2011 .

[37]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[38]  Joseph J. Bozell,et al.  Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—the US Department of Energy’s “Top 10” revisited , 2010 .

[39]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[40]  Kes McCormick,et al.  The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview , 2013 .

[41]  Johnathan E. Holladay,et al.  Top Value Added Chemicals From Biomass. Volume 1 - Results of Screening for Potential Candidates From Sugars and Synthesis Gas , 2004 .

[42]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Path Creation as a Process of Resource Alignment and Anchoring: Industry Formation for On-Site Water Recycling in Beijing , 2016 .

[43]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Diversity Creation and Technological Systems: A Technology Policy Perspective , 2013 .

[44]  Piergiuseppe Morone,et al.  Innovation niches and socio-technical transition: A case study of bio-refinery production , 2011 .

[45]  Johan P.M. Sanders,et al.  Bulk chemicals from biomass , 2008 .

[46]  M. Kircher The transition to a bio‐economy: emerging from the oil age , 2012 .

[47]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.

[48]  Cali Nuur,et al.  The transformation of pulp and paper industries: the role of local networks and institutions , 2013 .

[49]  Joseph J. Bozell,et al.  Feedstocks for the Future : Biorefinery Production of Chemicals from Renewable Carbon , 2008 .

[50]  Simon J. Bennett,et al.  From petrochemical complexes to biorefineries? The past and prospective co-evolution of liquid fuels and chemicals production in the UK , 2009 .

[51]  S. Godtfredsen,et al.  Ullmann ' s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry , 2017 .

[52]  Paul Stuart,et al.  Biofuel production in an integrated forest biorefinery: Technology identification under uncertainty , 2010 .

[53]  Satu Pätäri,et al.  Industry- and company-level factors influencing the development of the forest energy business — insights from a Delphi Study , 2010 .

[54]  Ioannis V. Skiadas,et al.  Toward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems , 2009 .

[55]  Anna Ekman,et al.  Possibilities for sustainable biorefineries based on agricultural residues – A case study of potential straw-based ethanol production in Sweden , 2013 .

[56]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system , 2008 .

[57]  S. Hämäläinen,et al.  Forest biorefineries - a business opportunity for the Finnish forest cluster. , 2011 .

[58]  David K. Johnson,et al.  Top Value-Added Chemicals from Biomass - Volume II—Results of Screening for Potential Candidates from Biorefinery Lignin , 2007 .

[59]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[60]  Kes McCormick,et al.  Governance of biofuels for transport in Europe: lessons from Sweden and the UK , 2012 .

[61]  Michael Oborne,et al.  The bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda , 2010 .

[62]  Kalevi Kyläheiko,et al.  Opening up new strategic options in the pulp and paper industry: Case biorefineries , 2011 .

[63]  Paul Stuart,et al.  Partnerships for successful enterprise transformation of forest industry companies implementing the forest biorefinery. , 2009 .

[64]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Making or breaking environmental innovation? , 2010 .

[65]  P. F. Levy,et al.  Biorefining of biomass to liquid fuels and organic chemicals , 1981 .

[66]  P. Stuart,et al.  Successful partnerships for the forest biorefinery , 2008 .

[67]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series Why does Renewable Energy diffuse so slowly ? A review of innovation system problems , 2011 .

[68]  E. Jong,et al.  Product developments in the bio‐based chemicals arena , 2012 .

[69]  Philip Peck,et al.  Examining understanding, acceptance, and support for the biorefinery concept among EU policy‐makers , 2009 .

[70]  Staffan Laestadius,et al.  Beyond papermaking: technology and market shifts for wood-based biomass industries – management implications for large-scale industries , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[71]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries: the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses , 2017, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[72]  T. Foxon,et al.  Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime , 2008 .

[73]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Present and future development in plastics from biomass , 2010 .

[74]  V. Gilsing,et al.  A system failure framework for innovation policy design , 2005 .

[75]  B. Thorsen,et al.  Shades of green: a social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector , 2014 .

[76]  P. Cooke Transversality and Transition: Green Innovation and New Regional Path Creation , 2012 .

[77]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Methodology for biorefinery portfolio assessment using supply‐chain fundamentals of bioproducts , 2014 .