A Delphi Study Using Value-Focused Thinking for United States Air Force Mission Dependency Index Values

Abstract : Recently, the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) identified that the Mission Dependency Index (MDI) had issues with reflecting the criticality of some mission sets. The MDI is a constructed value assigned to assets that reflects the consequence of failure. The primary mission sets having MDI issues were non-flightline assets. The current Air Force MDI metric relies on data collected using the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) methodology and adapts the data by using facility categorization codes. The result is a method that compares alternatives to each other to develop an individual asset's MDI value. As a corrective measure to this methodology, non-flightline centric mission sets have been allowed to adjust (i.e. increase) their asset MDI values. This modification in MDI values has led to inflation of the metric. To address the issue, this research focuses on how the MDI values should be assigned by examining both public and private methodologies. Leveraging the Delphi technique and Value Focused Thinking (VFT), three models are created to suggest the proper inputs that should be considered when producing the MDI values for the Air Force's assets. The models inputs were interruptability, redundancy, replaceability and the number of missions affected.

[1]  D. M. Karydas,et al.  A method for the efficient prioritization of infrastructure renewal projects , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[3]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[4]  Gregory J. Skulmoski,et al.  Journal of Information Technology Education the Delphi Method for Graduate Research , 2022 .

[5]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[6]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Investigating Relationships and Semantic Sets amongst System Lifecycle Properties (Ilities) , 2012 .

[7]  Marcus Selart,et al.  Understanding the Role of Value‐Focused Thinking in Idea Management , 2011 .

[8]  Stephen P. Chambal,et al.  Decision Analysis Methodology to Evaluate Integrated Solid Waste Management Alternatives , 2001 .

[9]  Z. Schreiner Asset management optimization a new approach to protection maintenance , 2004 .

[10]  G. Edward Gibson,et al.  Scope Management Using Project Definition Rating Index , 1997 .

[11]  Bill Brodt,et al.  Mission Dependency Index–A Metric for Determining Infrastructure Criticality , 2008 .

[12]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Bulk power risk analysis: Ranking infrastructure elements according to their risk significance , 2008 .

[13]  George Wright,et al.  The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis , 1999 .

[14]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking , 1996 .

[15]  Michael N Grussing,et al.  Development of the Army Facility Mission Dependency Index for Infrastructure Asset Management , 2010 .

[16]  William E Sitzabee,et al.  A Strategic Assessment of Infrastructure Asset-Management Modeling , 2013 .

[17]  Isabela Fagundes Cagnin "The study of macro and micro implementation of social policy", de Paul Bierman , 2017 .

[18]  Craig W. Kirkwood Strategic decision making : multiobjective decision analysis with spreadsheets : instructor's manual , 1997 .

[19]  León Value-Focused Thinking versus Alternative-Focused Thinking: Effects on Generation of Objectives. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[20]  G. Edward Gibson,et al.  Building Project Scope Definition Using Project Definition Rating Index , 2001 .

[21]  G. Sauce,et al.  Risk-based investment trade-off related to building facility management , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Heng Li,et al.  Analytic network process applied to project selection , 2005 .